Integrating Large Language Models with Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Support

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, but its heterogeneous molecular subtypes make treatment decision-making complex and patient-specific. Both the pathology reports and the electronic medical record (EMR) play a critical role for an appropriate treatment decision. This study aimed to develop an integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) that combines a large language model (LLM)-based pathology analysis with deep learning-based treatment prediction to support standardized and reliable decision-making. <b>Methods</b>: Real-world data (RWD) obtained from a cohort of 5015 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were analyzed. Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct automatically extracted the TNM stage and tumor size from the pathology reports, which were then integrated with EMR variables. A multi-label classification of 16 treatment combinations was performed using six models, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, GBM, XGBoost, DNN, and Transformer. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, macro/micro-averaged precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. <b>Results</b>: Using combined LLM-extracted pathology and EMR features, GBM and XGBoost achieved the highest and most stable predictive performance across all feature subset configurations (macro-F1 ≈ 0.88-0.89; AUC = 0.867-0.868). Both models demonstrated strong discrimination ability and consistent recall and precision, highlighting their robustness for multi-label classification in real-world settings. Decision Tree and Random Forest showed moderate but reliable performance (macro-F1 = 0.84-0.86; AUC = 0.849-0.821), indicating their applicability despite lower predictive capability. By contrast, the DNN and Transformer models produced comparatively lower scores (macro-F1 = 0.74-0.82; AUC = 0.780-0.757), especially when using the full feature set, suggesting limited suitability for structured clinical data without strong contextual dependencies. These findings indicate that gradient-boosting ensemble approaches are better optimized for tabular medical data and generate more clinically reliable treatment recommendations. <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed artificial intelligence-based CDSS improves accuracy and consistency in breast cancer treatment decision support by integrating automated pathology interpretation with deep learning, demonstrating its potential utility in real-world cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16030394
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Large Language Models with Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Support

Takho Kang, Serin Ok, Meeyoung Park, Heeseung Park
Diagnostics
AI in cancer detection
article

Integrating Large Language Models with Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Treatment Decision Support

Takho Kang, Serin Ok, Meeyoung Park, Heeseung Park
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, but its heterogeneous molecular subtypes make treatment decision-making complex and patient-specific. Both the pathology reports and the electronic medical record (EMR) play a critical role for an appropriate treatment decision. This study aimed to develop an integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) that combines a large language model (LLM)-based pathology analysis with deep learning-based treatment prediction to support standardized and reliable decision-making. <b>Methods</b>: Real-world data (RWD) obtained from a cohort of 5015 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were analyzed. Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct automatically extracted the TNM stage and tumor size from the pathology reports, which were then integrated with EMR variables. A multi-label classification of 16 treatment combinations was performed using six models, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, GBM, XGBoost, DNN, and Transformer. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, macro/micro-averaged precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC. <b>Results</b>: Using combined LLM-extracted pathology and EMR features, GBM and XGBoost achieved the highest and most stable predictive performance across all feature subset configurations (macro-F1 ≈ 0.88-0.89; AUC = 0.867-0.868). Both models demonstrated strong discrimination ability and consistent recall and precision, highlighting their robustness for multi-label classification in real-world settings. Decision Tree and Random Forest showed moderate but reliable performance (macro-F1 = 0.84-0.86; AUC = 0.849-0.821), indicating their applicability despite lower predictive capability. By contrast, the DNN and Transformer models produced comparatively lower scores (macro-F1 = 0.74-0.82; AUC = 0.780-0.757), especially when using the full feature set, suggesting limited suitability for structured clinical data without strong contextual dependencies. These findings indicate that gradient-boosting ensemble approaches are better optimized for tabular medical data and generate more clinically reliable treatment recommendations. <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed artificial intelligence-based CDSS improves accuracy and consistency in breast cancer treatment decision support by integrating automated pathology interpretation with deep learning, demonstrating its potential utility in real-world cancer care.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(3)
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR), Kyungnam University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.