Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate individual preferences to medicate cancer-related symptoms with cannabis

In October 2018, Canada legalized non-medical cannabis, increasing accessibility nationwide. Although a separate medical cannabis framework exists, many individuals with cancer may now obtain cannabis through non-medical channels rather than through the medical system. This shift raises questions about how legalization has influenced patients’ attitudes and preferences regarding the use of cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms and treatment side effects. We aimed to determine individuals’ preferences for using cannabis as a complementary therapy in cancer survivorship. Members of a Canadian research panel completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess preferences for medicinal cannabis. Respondents completed 12 choice sets, each consisting of two health states described by seven attributes identified from previous qualitative work, as well as an opt-out option. The seven attributes were cannabis effectiveness, ability to perform everyday activities, chance of unwanted side effects, opinions of family and friends about cannabis, doctor’s opinion of cannabis, access to cannabis, and out-of-pocket cost. Each attribute had three or four levels. DCE responses were analyzed using an error-component mixed logit regression model to estimate the relative attribute importance and willingness-to-pay. The dataset included 1,089 respondents who completed at least one choice set. Of these, 61.5% (n = 670) reported no experience with cancer, and 35.5% (n = 387) had some experience with cannabis. Analysis of the DCE responses demonstrated that respondents preferred the effective management of cancer symptoms and the ability to perform everyday activities. Respondents expressed disutility for unwanted side effects resulting from cannabis use. To our knowledge, this is the first study to elicit general population preferences for medicinal cannabis in the context of cancer survivorship. Insights from these preferences may inform policy and priority-setting to support equitable access to medical cannabis for symptom management improved quality of life among individuals with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cannabis Research
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00392-1
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate individual preferences to medicate cancer-related symptoms with cannabis

Helen McTaggart‐Cowan, Sara Izadi‐Najafabadi, Colene Bentley, Adam J.N. Raymakers
Journal of Cannabis Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate individual preferences to medicate cancer-related symptoms with cannabis

Helen McTaggart‐Cowan, Sara Izadi‐Najafabadi, Colene Bentley, Adam J.N. Raymakers
article en

Abstract

In October 2018, Canada legalized non-medical cannabis, increasing accessibility nationwide. Although a separate medical cannabis framework exists, many individuals with cancer may now obtain cannabis through non-medical channels rather than through the medical system. This shift raises questions about how legalization has influenced patients’ attitudes and preferences regarding the use of cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms and treatment side effects. We aimed to determine individuals’ preferences for using cannabis as a complementary therapy in cancer survivorship. Members of a Canadian research panel completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to assess preferences for medicinal cannabis. Respondents completed 12 choice sets, each consisting of two health states described by seven attributes identified from previous qualitative work, as well as an opt-out option. The seven attributes were cannabis effectiveness, ability to perform everyday activities, chance of unwanted side effects, opinions of family and friends about cannabis, doctor’s opinion of cannabis, access to cannabis, and out-of-pocket cost. Each attribute had three or four levels. DCE responses were analyzed using an error-component mixed logit regression model to estimate the relative attribute importance and willingness-to-pay. The dataset included 1,089 respondents who completed at least one choice set. Of these, 61.5% (n = 670) reported no experience with cancer, and 35.5% (n = 387) had some experience with cannabis. Analysis of the DCE responses demonstrated that respondents preferred the effective management of cancer symptoms and the ability to perform everyday activities. Respondents expressed disutility for unwanted side effects resulting from cannabis use. To our knowledge, this is the first study to elicit general population preferences for medicinal cannabis in the context of cancer survivorship. Insights from these preferences may inform policy and priority-setting to support equitable access to medical cannabis for symptom management improved quality of life among individuals with cancer.

Journal of Cannabis ResearchVol. 8(1)
Simon Fraser University (CA), Institute of Population and Public Health (CA), Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.