The Effects of Ankle Versus Plantar Vibrotactile Orthoses on Joint Position Sense and Postural Control in Individuals with Functional Ankle Instability: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Functional ankle instability (FAI) is a common consequence of lateral ankle sprains, characterized by impaired sensorimotor control. While orthoses and localized vibration have shown individual benefits for FAI, their combined application in a wearable device has not been previously investigated. This pilot randomized trial compared the effects of a vibrotactile foot orthosis (VFO) and a vibrotactile ankle orthosis (VAO) on joint position sense (JPS) and postural control in individuals with FAI. Sixteen participants were randomized to receive either a VFO or a VAO, both delivering 30-50 Hz pulsed vibration in 20 min sessions, three times a week, for two weeks. Outcome measures included joint position sense (JPS) error (°), center of pressure (COP) velocity (mm/s), the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and the Six-Meter Hop Test (SMHT), which were assessed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and after two weeks of use. The analysis showed a statistically significant interaction between time and intervention group for JPS error (<i>p</i> = 0.02, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.42). Specifically, the VFO group improved JPS significantly more than VAO at two weeks follow-up (MD = -1.75°, <i>p</i> = 0.005, d = -1.68). Both groups significantly reduced in anteroposterior COP velocity after two weeks (VFO: MD = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.003, d = 1.47; VAO: MD = 1.39, <i>p</i> ˂ 0.001, d = 2.05) with no between-group differences. No changes were observed in the SEBT or SMHT. Plantar-based vibrotactile stimulation was more effective than ankle-based stimulation in enhancing proprioceptive acuity in individuals with FAI. Both interventions improved static postural stability, supporting the potential of integrated vibrotactile orthoses in FAI rehabilitation. No major practical issues were reported during the intervention. Two participants experienced minor discomfort related to the electronic housing bulk in the first week, which was resolved by week two. No further complaints regarding device weight or usability were observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13020138
Primary Topic
Effects of Vibration on Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Ankle Versus Plantar Vibrotactile Orthoses on Joint Position Sense and Postural Control in Individuals with Functional Ankle Instability: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Mahmood Bahramizadeh, Hanieh Khaliliyan, Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
Bioengineering
Effects of Vibration on Health
article

The Effects of Ankle Versus Plantar Vibrotactile Orthoses on Joint Position Sense and Postural Control in Individuals with Functional Ankle Instability: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Mahmood Bahramizadeh, Hanieh Khaliliyan, Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
article en

Abstract

Functional ankle instability (FAI) is a common consequence of lateral ankle sprains, characterized by impaired sensorimotor control. While orthoses and localized vibration have shown individual benefits for FAI, their combined application in a wearable device has not been previously investigated. This pilot randomized trial compared the effects of a vibrotactile foot orthosis (VFO) and a vibrotactile ankle orthosis (VAO) on joint position sense (JPS) and postural control in individuals with FAI. Sixteen participants were randomized to receive either a VFO or a VAO, both delivering 30-50 Hz pulsed vibration in 20 min sessions, three times a week, for two weeks. Outcome measures included joint position sense (JPS) error (°), center of pressure (COP) velocity (mm/s), the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and the Six-Meter Hop Test (SMHT), which were assessed pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and after two weeks of use. The analysis showed a statistically significant interaction between time and intervention group for JPS error (<i>p</i> = 0.02, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.42). Specifically, the VFO group improved JPS significantly more than VAO at two weeks follow-up (MD = -1.75°, <i>p</i> = 0.005, d = -1.68). Both groups significantly reduced in anteroposterior COP velocity after two weeks (VFO: MD = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.003, d = 1.47; VAO: MD = 1.39, <i>p</i> ˂ 0.001, d = 2.05) with no between-group differences. No changes were observed in the SEBT or SMHT. Plantar-based vibrotactile stimulation was more effective than ankle-based stimulation in enhancing proprioceptive acuity in individuals with FAI. Both interventions improved static postural stability, supporting the potential of integrated vibrotactile orthoses in FAI rehabilitation. No major practical issues were reported during the intervention. Two participants experienced minor discomfort related to the electronic housing bulk in the first week, which was resolved by week two. No further complaints regarding device weight or usability were observed.

BioengineeringVol. 13(2)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Effects of Vibration on Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.