Stigma Toward Mental Illness Among Non-Psychiatrist Doctors in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Mental illness stigma among healthcare professionals can adversely affect patient care and recovery. While attitudes are shifting globally, limited data exist on stigma among non-psychiatrist doctors (NPDs) in India. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of NPDs toward mental illness and psychiatry using the Mental Illness Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA-4), and to explore associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted across India over six months in 2022, following ethics approval. The survey link was distributed via professional social media platforms using convenience and snowball sampling. Non-psychiatrist doctors with at least an MBBS degree were eligible. The MICA-4 scale assessed stigma across five domains. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and multiple regression analysis were conducted. Results: A total of 102 responses were analysed. The mean MICA-4 score was 48.37, indicating moderately positive attitudes. Domain-wise analysis revealed higher stigma in knowledge/misconception and self-disclosure domains, while attitudes towards ethics and patient care were more favourable. No significant differences were found by gender, specialty, or practice setting. Weekly psychiatric caseload was not associated with reduced stigma. Internal consistency of the scale was low (Cronbach’s α = 0.46), raising concerns about cultural fit. The regression model was statistically significant F (5, 96) = 661.95, p < 0.001, explaining 97.18% of the variance in overall attitudes toward mental illness. Among the five domains, Respect for Psychiatry and Knowledge and Misconceptions emerged as the strongest predictors, highlighting their critical role in shaping positive professional attitudes in the public sector. Conclusions: Stigma toward mental illness persists among NPDs, particularly around misconceptions and help-seeking attitudes. These biases are culturally embedded and may not be significantly influenced by clinical exposure alone. While stigma was generally moderate, persistent misconceptions and self-stigma point to the importance of further developing culturally adapted tools and systemic interventions to promote reflective practice and ethical parity in clinical settings.