A Study on the Nianfo 念佛 Practice in the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna

The Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna 大乘起信論 has generated over 300 commentaries, yet research on its practice section, particularly nianfo practice 念佛修行, remains remarkably limited. This study examines interpretive differences in the nianfo practice section across major commentaries: Wŏnhyo’s Kisillon so 起信論疏, Fazang’s 法藏 Dasheng qixinlun yiji 大乘起信論義記, the Shi moheyan lun 釋摩訶衍論, Tankuang’s 曇曠 Dasheng qixin lun guangshi 大乘起信論廣釋, and Zixuan’s 子璿 Qixin lun shu bixueji 起信論疏筆削記. Two key discrepancies emerge: the scope of scriptural citations and interpretations of “those who achieve rebirth.” Analysis reveals that while Fazang was influenced by Wŏnhyo, he developed independent interpretations. Later commentaries demonstrate selective reception rather than uncritical acceptance of predecessors. Post-Bixueji commentaries divide into two groups: the Qixinlun jieyao 起信論捷要, Dasheng qixinlun shulue 大乘起信論疏略, Qixinlun zhijie 起信論直解, and Qixinlun shuji huiyue 起信論疏記會閱 form one group, while the Qixinlun zuanzhu 起信論纂註 and Qixinlun xushu 起信論續疏 constitute another. This investigation illuminates doctrinal relationships among commentaries and confirms that later commentators built upon earlier works while contributing original insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17020137
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Nianfo 念佛 Practice in the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna

Jiyun Kim
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
article

A Study on the Nianfo 念佛 Practice in the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna

Jiyun Kim
article en

Abstract

The Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna 大乘起信論 has generated over 300 commentaries, yet research on its practice section, particularly nianfo practice 念佛修行, remains remarkably limited. This study examines interpretive differences in the nianfo practice section across major commentaries: Wŏnhyo’s Kisillon so 起信論疏, Fazang’s 法藏 Dasheng qixinlun yiji 大乘起信論義記, the Shi moheyan lun 釋摩訶衍論, Tankuang’s 曇曠 Dasheng qixin lun guangshi 大乘起信論廣釋, and Zixuan’s 子璿 Qixin lun shu bixueji 起信論疏筆削記. Two key discrepancies emerge: the scope of scriptural citations and interpretations of “those who achieve rebirth.” Analysis reveals that while Fazang was influenced by Wŏnhyo, he developed independent interpretations. Later commentaries demonstrate selective reception rather than uncritical acceptance of predecessors. Post-Bixueji commentaries divide into two groups: the Qixinlun jieyao 起信論捷要, Dasheng qixinlun shulue 大乘起信論疏略, Qixinlun zhijie 起信論直解, and Qixinlun shuji huiyue 起信論疏記會閱 form one group, while the Qixinlun zuanzhu 起信論纂註 and Qixinlun xushu 起信論續疏 constitute another. This investigation illuminates doctrinal relationships among commentaries and confirms that later commentators built upon earlier works while contributing original insights.

ReligionsVol. 17(2)
Dongguk University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on the Nianfo 念佛 Practice in the Awakening of Faith in Mahāyāna — Jiyun Kim · Religions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS