Contrasting responses of carbon fluxes to hydrothermal drivers in dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems of the temperate steppe

This study focused on dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems, two dominant ecosystem types within the temperate steppe. CO2 flux dynamics and key hydrothermal drivers were comparatively analyzed using eddy covariance observations, with a view to revealing their threshold effects and lag responses. Results revealed that the wet meadow ecosystem (WME) acted as a significantly stronger CO2 sink with greater flux variability compared to the dry grassland ecosystem (DGE). While both ecosystems shared similar seasonal trends, they operated under fundamentally different regulatory mechanisms. In the DGE, net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was primarily regulated by latent heat flux (LE) and net radiation (Rn), leading to the system being energy-limited and prone to saturation. Net CO₂ uptake increased rapidly only under low-energy conditions, but a clear physiological saturation threshold was identified (LE > 74.7 W m−2 and Rn > 146.8 W m−2), suggesting that limited soil moisture restricted the ability of DGE to utilize excess energy for photosynthesis. In contrast, the WME, benefiting from abundant soil moisture, experienced a continuous intensification of net CO₂ uptake with increasing LE, Rn, and VPD. This response pattern successfully surpassed the energy saturation limits observed in the DGE. Nevertheless, a hydraulic limitation mechanism emerged under extreme atmospheric dryness, where CO₂ uptake plateaued when VPD exceeded 39.50 hPa, indicating stomatal closure to prevent water loss. At the diurnal scale, CO₂ fluxes closely tracked energy-related drivers, showing minimal lag effects. In the DGE, lag relationships with hydrothermal factors remained stable throughout the growing season, while they fluctuated significantly in the WME, particularly with soil temperature and VPD. These results offer key insights for assessing CO₂ sink potential and inform ecosystem conservation strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114662
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting responses of carbon fluxes to hydrothermal drivers in dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems of the temperate steppe

Limin Duan, Jiakang Fu, Tingxi Liu, Guixin Zhang et al.
Ecological Indicators
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

Contrasting responses of carbon fluxes to hydrothermal drivers in dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems of the temperate steppe

Limin Duan, Jiakang Fu, Tingxi Liu, Guixin Zhang, Jianguo Ji, Jianwei Liu, Yixuan Wang
article en

Abstract

This study focused on dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems, two dominant ecosystem types within the temperate steppe. CO2 flux dynamics and key hydrothermal drivers were comparatively analyzed using eddy covariance observations, with a view to revealing their threshold effects and lag responses. Results revealed that the wet meadow ecosystem (WME) acted as a significantly stronger CO2 sink with greater flux variability compared to the dry grassland ecosystem (DGE). While both ecosystems shared similar seasonal trends, they operated under fundamentally different regulatory mechanisms. In the DGE, net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was primarily regulated by latent heat flux (LE) and net radiation (Rn), leading to the system being energy-limited and prone to saturation. Net CO₂ uptake increased rapidly only under low-energy conditions, but a clear physiological saturation threshold was identified (LE > 74.7 W m−2 and Rn > 146.8 W m−2), suggesting that limited soil moisture restricted the ability of DGE to utilize excess energy for photosynthesis. In contrast, the WME, benefiting from abundant soil moisture, experienced a continuous intensification of net CO₂ uptake with increasing LE, Rn, and VPD. This response pattern successfully surpassed the energy saturation limits observed in the DGE. Nevertheless, a hydraulic limitation mechanism emerged under extreme atmospheric dryness, where CO₂ uptake plateaued when VPD exceeded 39.50 hPa, indicating stomatal closure to prevent water loss. At the diurnal scale, CO₂ fluxes closely tracked energy-related drivers, showing minimal lag effects. In the DGE, lag relationships with hydrothermal factors remained stable throughout the growing season, while they fluctuated significantly in the WME, particularly with soil temperature and VPD. These results offer key insights for assessing CO₂ sink potential and inform ecosystem conservation strategies.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 183
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contrasting responses of carbon fluxes to hydrothermal drivers in dry grassland and wet meadow ecosystems of the temperate steppe — Limin Duan, Jiakang Fu, et al. · Ecological Indicators (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS