Predictive Performance of Bayesian Methods to Forecast Vancomycin Concentration for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients

<b>Background:</b> This study aimed to evaluate different Bayesian algorithms and the first-order pharmacokinetics (PK) equation approach for forecasting vancomycin concentrations in critically ill pediatric patients and to identify influencing factors. <b>Methods:</b> A cohort of 110 patients with 568 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) blood samples was included. Three Bayesian algorithms, i.e., conventional, flattened, and weighted-flattened, using one or two historical values of either blood concentrations measured at the peak, trough, or middle (mid) of the dosing interval, were applied to forecast the concentrations of the next TDM occasion. The first-order PK approach, according to the Sawchuk-Zaske method, was used with two levels. The forecasting performance was assessed via relative bias (rBias) and relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) between the forecasted and observed levels. A linearmixed-effects model was employed to identify potential influencing factors on the rBias and rRMSE. <b>Results:</b> All methods showed negative rBias values of less than -20% and had relatively similar rRMSE of about 40%. First-order PK had lower bias than the conventional and flattened Bayesian algorithm (-10% vs. -15%), but higher bias than the weighted-flattened Bayesian algorithm (rBias -5%). Multivariate analysis using the linear mixed-effects model revealed that the type of forecasting algorithms significantly impacted the predictability. The weighted-flattened Bayesian algorithm significantly improved the rBias by 12.660% (95% CI: 10.131-15.194, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and decreased the rRMSE by 2.099% (CI 95% 3.779-0.418, <i>p</i>-value = 0.014) compared to the conventional Bayesian model. Either using one (mid or trough) or two concentrations in Bayesian forecasting yielded comparable rBias and rRMSE. <b>Conclusion:</b> The weighted-flattened Bayesian estimation method with solely one blood level is appropriate for forecasting the vancomycin concentration during therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18020160
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Performance of Bayesian Methods to Forecast Vancomycin Concentration for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients

Minh N. Tran, Linh Hoang, Tuan Khai N, Anh Hoang Nguyen et al.
Pharmaceutics
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

Predictive Performance of Bayesian Methods to Forecast Vancomycin Concentration for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients

Minh N. Tran, Linh Hoang, Tuan Khai N, Anh Hoang Nguyen, T. M. P. Nguyen, Thao P. Nguyen, Dien Minh Tran, Hoan Vu, H. Pham, Phuc H. Phan, Cuc T. Nguyen, Ha T. H. Nguyen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study aimed to evaluate different Bayesian algorithms and the first-order pharmacokinetics (PK) equation approach for forecasting vancomycin concentrations in critically ill pediatric patients and to identify influencing factors. <b>Methods:</b> A cohort of 110 patients with 568 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) blood samples was included. Three Bayesian algorithms, i.e., conventional, flattened, and weighted-flattened, using one or two historical values of either blood concentrations measured at the peak, trough, or middle (mid) of the dosing interval, were applied to forecast the concentrations of the next TDM occasion. The first-order PK approach, according to the Sawchuk-Zaske method, was used with two levels. The forecasting performance was assessed via relative bias (rBias) and relative root mean squared error (rRMSE) between the forecasted and observed levels. A linearmixed-effects model was employed to identify potential influencing factors on the rBias and rRMSE. <b>Results:</b> All methods showed negative rBias values of less than -20% and had relatively similar rRMSE of about 40%. First-order PK had lower bias than the conventional and flattened Bayesian algorithm (-10% vs. -15%), but higher bias than the weighted-flattened Bayesian algorithm (rBias -5%). Multivariate analysis using the linear mixed-effects model revealed that the type of forecasting algorithms significantly impacted the predictability. The weighted-flattened Bayesian algorithm significantly improved the rBias by 12.660% (95% CI: 10.131-15.194, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and decreased the rRMSE by 2.099% (CI 95% 3.779-0.418, <i>p</i>-value = 0.014) compared to the conventional Bayesian model. Either using one (mid or trough) or two concentrations in Bayesian forecasting yielded comparable rBias and rRMSE. <b>Conclusion:</b> The weighted-flattened Bayesian estimation method with solely one blood level is appropriate for forecasting the vancomycin concentration during therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill children.

PharmaceuticsVol. 18(2)
Hanoi University of Business and Technology (VN), Hanoi University of Pharmacy (VN), Vietnam National Children's Hospital (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.