Landscape of Research on Accounting Scope 3 Emissions: A Review of Methodologies and Data

ABSTRACT Scope 3 emissions have been proposed as a critical metric for evaluating corporate carbon footprint, identifying emission sources, and developing mitigation solutions. Yet, widespread corporate reporting of Scope 3 emissions remains limited, highlighting a critical gap in both research and practice. This review examines current Scope 3 accounting methods and data availability. Findings show accounting accuracy suffers from inconsistent methodologies and insufficient data transparency. Existing research has predominantly examined firms in the Energy and Information Technology sectors, with limited attention to Real Estate, Health Care, and Utilities. A lack of standardized system boundaries and assessment frameworks hinders comparability, while missing inter‐enterprise trade data leads to emissions underestimation. Additionally, supply chain network topology and production processes introduce double‐counting errors. Proposed solutions include firm‐level input–output tables, transparent accounting categorizations, and redistribution of emission responsibility via network reconstruction. The potential of advanced information technologies in improving data curation is also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70429
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape of Research on Accounting Scope 3 Emissions: A Review of Methodologies and Data

Franco Ruzzenenti, Zeyu Wang, Xin Sun, Klaus Hubacek
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Landscape of Research on Accounting Scope 3 Emissions: A Review of Methodologies and Data

Franco Ruzzenenti, Zeyu Wang, Xin Sun, Klaus Hubacek
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scope 3 emissions have been proposed as a critical metric for evaluating corporate carbon footprint, identifying emission sources, and developing mitigation solutions. Yet, widespread corporate reporting of Scope 3 emissions remains limited, highlighting a critical gap in both research and practice. This review examines current Scope 3 accounting methods and data availability. Findings show accounting accuracy suffers from inconsistent methodologies and insufficient data transparency. Existing research has predominantly examined firms in the Energy and Information Technology sectors, with limited attention to Real Estate, Health Care, and Utilities. A lack of standardized system boundaries and assessment frameworks hinders comparability, while missing inter‐enterprise trade data leads to emissions underestimation. Additionally, supply chain network topology and production processes introduce double‐counting errors. Proposed solutions include firm‐level input–output tables, transparent accounting categorizations, and redistribution of emission responsibility via network reconstruction. The potential of advanced information technologies in improving data curation is also discussed.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
University of Groningen (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.