Quality of life and multiple long-term conditions in Southeast Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This review systematically synthesised the evidence on quality of life measures and outcomes for people living with multiple long-term conditions in the Southeast Asia region. Results were analysed using a combination of methods, meta-analysis for studies where the same quality of life score was reported across three or more cohorts, and descriptive narrative synthesis. In total, 34 studies comprising 11,876 participants were included in the narrative synthesis and 14 of these were included in meta-analysis. The most common quality of life tools used included WHOQOL-BREF (n = 8) and EQ-5D-5L (n = 3) with pooled mean values of 70.47 (95% CI: 62.71 to 78.24) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.84) respectively, indicating reduced but good quality of life. As healthcare systems adapt to the evolving challenges associated with multiple long-term conditions, understanding the tools and measures used to assess quality of life in different contexts becomes imperative to account for disease combinations and cultural nuances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-68197-z
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life and multiple long-term conditions in Southeast Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shavez Jeffers, C Gillies, Ashkon Ardavani, Amrit Banstola et al.
Nature Communications
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Quality of life and multiple long-term conditions in Southeast Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shavez Jeffers, C Gillies, Ashkon Ardavani, Amrit Banstola, Shabana Cassambai, Natalia Oli, Monika Arora, A. Vaidya, Shifalika Goenka, Ruksar Abdala, Nikhil Srinivasapura Venkateshmur, Arron Peace, AAKRUSHI BRAHMBHATT, Sailesh Mohan, Deborah Ikhile, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Kamlesh Khunti, Kuldeep Singh, Mark P. Funnell, Patrick Highton, Prakash Mulakalapalli
article en

Abstract

This review systematically synthesised the evidence on quality of life measures and outcomes for people living with multiple long-term conditions in the Southeast Asia region. Results were analysed using a combination of methods, meta-analysis for studies where the same quality of life score was reported across three or more cohorts, and descriptive narrative synthesis. In total, 34 studies comprising 11,876 participants were included in the narrative synthesis and 14 of these were included in meta-analysis. The most common quality of life tools used included WHOQOL-BREF (n = 8) and EQ-5D-5L (n = 3) with pooled mean values of 70.47 (95% CI: 62.71 to 78.24) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.84) respectively, indicating reduced but good quality of life. As healthcare systems adapt to the evolving challenges associated with multiple long-term conditions, understanding the tools and measures used to assess quality of life in different contexts becomes imperative to account for disease combinations and cultural nuances.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Leicester (GB), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), East Midlands Academic Health Science Network (GB), Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN), Youth & Family Services (US), NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Brunel University of London (GB), Middlesex University London (GB), Public Health Foundation of India (IN), Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (NP)
Government of the United Kingdom, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.