Trajectory Patterns of Hygiene Training Effectiveness Across Three Instructional Modes

Background: Hygiene and food-safety training is a critical public health strategy for preventing contamination and promoting safe food-handling practices in community settings. This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of In-person, Online, and Hybrid instructional modes in enhancing hygiene and food-safety competencies among trainees in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Methods: Using a longitudinal quasi-experimental design, performance was measured at 12, 24, and 36 months across four domains: Personal Health & Hygiene, Food Hazards, Cleaning and Sanitation, and Good Manufacturing Practices. A total of 384 students met all inclusion criteria and completed the full series of evaluations. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed. Results: Competency scores increased significantly over time in all instructional modes (p < 0.001). Hybrid learners demonstrated the highest early longitudinal gains at 12 months (mean score, M = 20.88), compared with In-person (M = 10.28) and Online (M = 10.57). At 36 months, Online learners achieved the highest performance (M = 19.50), indicating stronger long-term retention. Effect size analysis using eta squared (η2) showed large effects for Cleaning and Sanitation (η2 = 0.196), Good Manufacturing Practices (η2 = 0.115), and overall performance (η2 = 0.138). Standardized Mean Change (SMC) indicated substantial improvement across modes, with Hybrid showing the greatest early change (SMC = 41.76 at 12 months) and Online exhibiting the strongest long-term improvement (SMC = 38.80 at 36 months). Training Efficiency Index (TEI) identified In-person instruction as most efficient (TEI = 30.55), followed by Online (29.49) and Hybrid (19.56). Linear Mixed-Effects Regression confirmed significant main effects of Time (β = 4.82, p < 0.001) and Mode (β = 3.97, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Mode interaction (β = −1.42, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The findings indicate that Hybrid instruction supports rapid early competency gains, while Online instruction yields superior long-term mastery of hygiene and food-safety competencies. These results provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing hygiene training programs in community and public health contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hygiene
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene6010005
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trajectory Patterns of Hygiene Training Effectiveness Across Three Instructional Modes

Mark Raguindin Limon, Christian Jay P. Pungtilan, Karl Lorenze E. Gumsat, Shaira Vita Mae G. Adviento et al.
Hygiene
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Trajectory Patterns of Hygiene Training Effectiveness Across Three Instructional Modes

Mark Raguindin Limon, Christian Jay P. Pungtilan, Karl Lorenze E. Gumsat, Shaira Vita Mae G. Adviento, Marie Dale R. Soriano, Shareen Kate A. Gamiao, Jacqueline B. Reyes, Jessica Camille B. Ramirez, Shiella Mae G. Juan, Chariza Mae B. Basamot, Athena Germynne D. Amano, Louwelyn B. Baclagan
article en

Abstract

Background: Hygiene and food-safety training is a critical public health strategy for preventing contamination and promoting safe food-handling practices in community settings. This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of In-person, Online, and Hybrid instructional modes in enhancing hygiene and food-safety competencies among trainees in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Methods: Using a longitudinal quasi-experimental design, performance was measured at 12, 24, and 36 months across four domains: Personal Health & Hygiene, Food Hazards, Cleaning and Sanitation, and Good Manufacturing Practices. A total of 384 students met all inclusion criteria and completed the full series of evaluations. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed. Results: Competency scores increased significantly over time in all instructional modes (p < 0.001). Hybrid learners demonstrated the highest early longitudinal gains at 12 months (mean score, M = 20.88), compared with In-person (M = 10.28) and Online (M = 10.57). At 36 months, Online learners achieved the highest performance (M = 19.50), indicating stronger long-term retention. Effect size analysis using eta squared (η2) showed large effects for Cleaning and Sanitation (η2 = 0.196), Good Manufacturing Practices (η2 = 0.115), and overall performance (η2 = 0.138). Standardized Mean Change (SMC) indicated substantial improvement across modes, with Hybrid showing the greatest early change (SMC = 41.76 at 12 months) and Online exhibiting the strongest long-term improvement (SMC = 38.80 at 36 months). Training Efficiency Index (TEI) identified In-person instruction as most efficient (TEI = 30.55), followed by Online (29.49) and Hybrid (19.56). Linear Mixed-Effects Regression confirmed significant main effects of Time (β = 4.82, p < 0.001) and Mode (β = 3.97, p < 0.001), as well as a significant Time × Mode interaction (β = −1.42, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The findings indicate that Hybrid instruction supports rapid early competency gains, while Online instruction yields superior long-term mastery of hygiene and food-safety competencies. These results provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing hygiene training programs in community and public health contexts.

HygieneVol. 6(1)
Mariano Marcos State University (PH), Northwestern University (PH), Stornoway Diamond (Canada) (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.