Psychometric Evaluation of the 15-Item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study Among English- and Chinese-Speaking Adult Mental Health Service Users

<b>Objectives</b>: Mindfulness has been proposed as an important health outcome and an indicator of mental well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15) in two samples of mental health service users with diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds (English- and Chinese-speaking). The study addresses the conceptual gap regarding the limited validation of the FFMQ-15 in Chinese-speaking clinical populations and examines the implications of measurement invariance. This study aimed at (1) confirming the reliability and validity of the FFMQ-15 in mental health service users; (2) assessing the validity of the FFMQ-15 in Chinese-speaking populations, where evidence is limited; and (3) examining measurement invariance across English- and Chinese-speaking groups to ensure cross-cultural applicability and comparable score interpretation. <b>Methods</b>: Participants were recruited using snowball sampling and social media advertising, targeting adults aged 18 or older who could read and write English or Chinese and had received mental health services. The English-speaking sample comprised 115 adults, and the Chinese-speaking sample included 118 adults. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify structural dimensions, while confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for both samples to evaluate the five-factor structure of the FFMQ-15. <b>Results</b>: The EFA showed literature-aligned results supporting the 5-factor structure model, while the CFA model demonstrated acceptable fit: χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 159.50/80 = 1.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001; CFI = 0.927; TLI = 0.904; RMSEA = 0.065 (90% CI [0.050, 0.080]); SRMR = 0.060, BIC = 10,843.067, meeting established thresholds, and the non-significant measurement variance indicated the measurement model's consistency among clinical patients and across different cultural contexts. <b>Conclusions</b>: The FFMQ-15 shows strong psychometric properties for measuring mindfulness in English- and Chinese-speaking mental health service users, supporting its value in clinical research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14030307
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the 15-Item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study Among English- and Chinese-Speaking Adult Mental Health Service Users

Peejay D. Bengwasan, Amos En Zhe Lian, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Hong Wang Fung et al.
Healthcare
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the 15-Item Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study Among English- and Chinese-Speaking Adult Mental Health Service Users

Peejay D. Bengwasan, Amos En Zhe Lian, Ming Yu Claudia Wong, Hong Wang Fung, Shan-yan Huang, Guangzhe Frank Yuan, Aslı Dila Akiş, Görkem Derin
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: Mindfulness has been proposed as an important health outcome and an indicator of mental well-being. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15) in two samples of mental health service users with diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds (English- and Chinese-speaking). The study addresses the conceptual gap regarding the limited validation of the FFMQ-15 in Chinese-speaking clinical populations and examines the implications of measurement invariance. This study aimed at (1) confirming the reliability and validity of the FFMQ-15 in mental health service users; (2) assessing the validity of the FFMQ-15 in Chinese-speaking populations, where evidence is limited; and (3) examining measurement invariance across English- and Chinese-speaking groups to ensure cross-cultural applicability and comparable score interpretation. <b>Methods</b>: Participants were recruited using snowball sampling and social media advertising, targeting adults aged 18 or older who could read and write English or Chinese and had received mental health services. The English-speaking sample comprised 115 adults, and the Chinese-speaking sample included 118 adults. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify structural dimensions, while confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for both samples to evaluate the five-factor structure of the FFMQ-15. <b>Results</b>: The EFA showed literature-aligned results supporting the 5-factor structure model, while the CFA model demonstrated acceptable fit: χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 159.50/80 = 1.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001; CFI = 0.927; TLI = 0.904; RMSEA = 0.065 (90% CI [0.050, 0.080]); SRMR = 0.060, BIC = 10,843.067, meeting established thresholds, and the non-significant measurement variance indicated the measurement model's consistency among clinical patients and across different cultural contexts. <b>Conclusions</b>: The FFMQ-15 shows strong psychometric properties for measuring mindfulness in English- and Chinese-speaking mental health service users, supporting its value in clinical research and practice.

HealthcareVol. 14(3)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Overseas Chinese University (TW), Haliç University (TR), Leshan Normal University (CN), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Raffles University Iskandar (MY), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Columbia International University (US), De La Salle University (PH), Istanbul University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.