A Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

This systematic review examines 205 studies on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in psychiatry, psychology, psychotherapy, and clinical workflows. Furthermore, studies that directly evaluated at least one LLM in a mental health context were included in the extended detailed analysis. GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 were the most commonly assessed models. Although LLMs showed promising short-term performance across domains, most evaluations relied on small, non-longitudinal datasets and single-session testing, limiting generalizability. The evidence indicates rapid growth but significant methodological inconsistency, emphasizing the need for more diverse datasets, standardized evaluation, and long-term validation before clinical integration. This review also examines how LLMs are being incorporated into mental health practice, outlining key challenges, limitations, and emerging opportunities. Ethical, clinical, and technological considerations are proposed to guide responsible adoption. Given the complexity of mental health care, a multidisciplinary, human-centered approach remains essential to ensure that future LLM applications augment—rather than replace—professional expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15030524
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

Lefteris Moussiades, Evdokia Voultsiou
Electronics
Mental Health via Writing
article

A Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

Lefteris Moussiades, Evdokia Voultsiou
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examines 205 studies on the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in psychiatry, psychology, psychotherapy, and clinical workflows. Furthermore, studies that directly evaluated at least one LLM in a mental health context were included in the extended detailed analysis. GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 were the most commonly assessed models. Although LLMs showed promising short-term performance across domains, most evaluations relied on small, non-longitudinal datasets and single-session testing, limiting generalizability. The evidence indicates rapid growth but significant methodological inconsistency, emphasizing the need for more diverse datasets, standardized evaluation, and long-term validation before clinical integration. This review also examines how LLMs are being incorporated into mental health practice, outlining key challenges, limitations, and emerging opportunities. Ethical, clinical, and technological considerations are proposed to guide responsible adoption. Given the complexity of mental health care, a multidisciplinary, human-centered approach remains essential to ensure that future LLM applications augment—rather than replace—professional expertise.

ElectronicsVol. 15(3)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.