Flying green: Life cycle assessment and decomposition of bio-based sustainable aviation fuels production in Australia and global benchmarks

• Australia’s SAF trends mirror global high- and very high- SAF production scenarios. • Energy efficiency reduces SAF emissions in HEFA, FT, and AtJ pathways. • Scalability limits SAF carbon footprint reduction, especially for HEFA and AtJ. • Biomanufacturing boosts emission cuts, notably Australia’s oilseed SAF. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) are critical for sustainably transitioning the aviation sector into low-carbon status depending on the type of feedstock and technology. However, studies on the key factors that drive these environmental benefits, and the effect of emerging technologies such as biomanufacturing would have on SAF production in the future are limited. Consequently, we assessed the environmental impact of SAF production using biomass feedstock at the national level and investigated the key drivers of its carbon footprint (greenhouse gas emissions), focusing on Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA), Alcohol-to-Jet (AtJ), and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathways. Using Australia as a case study alongside a global benchmark, this study decomposed the life-cycle carbon footprint of SAF production into carbon intensity, energy efficiency, scalability, cost competitiveness, and industry size factors. Results reveal that the energy efficiency factor significantly reduces the SAF production carbon footprint across all three pathways. The scalability factor was a dominant challenge that greatly influenced the carbon footprint of SAF production across global scenarios, especially for HEFA and AtJ, while for Australia the effects of the scalability factor were smaller though remain a noticeable challenge for AtJ. The decomposition results in Australia resemble mostly the high- and very high- SAF production scenarios globally. Results of a sensitivity analysis suggest that biomanufacturing potentially enhances emission reductions for various SAF feedstocks in both Australia and globally, particularly for oilseed-based pathways in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101625
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flying green: Life cycle assessment and decomposition of bio-based sustainable aviation fuels production in Australia and global benchmarks

Walter O. Okelo, Aditi Mankad, Xueting Jiang
Energy Conversion and Management X
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Flying green: Life cycle assessment and decomposition of bio-based sustainable aviation fuels production in Australia and global benchmarks

Walter O. Okelo, Aditi Mankad, Xueting Jiang
article en

Abstract

• Australia’s SAF trends mirror global high- and very high- SAF production scenarios. • Energy efficiency reduces SAF emissions in HEFA, FT, and AtJ pathways. • Scalability limits SAF carbon footprint reduction, especially for HEFA and AtJ. • Biomanufacturing boosts emission cuts, notably Australia’s oilseed SAF. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) are critical for sustainably transitioning the aviation sector into low-carbon status depending on the type of feedstock and technology. However, studies on the key factors that drive these environmental benefits, and the effect of emerging technologies such as biomanufacturing would have on SAF production in the future are limited. Consequently, we assessed the environmental impact of SAF production using biomass feedstock at the national level and investigated the key drivers of its carbon footprint (greenhouse gas emissions), focusing on Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA), Alcohol-to-Jet (AtJ), and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) pathways. Using Australia as a case study alongside a global benchmark, this study decomposed the life-cycle carbon footprint of SAF production into carbon intensity, energy efficiency, scalability, cost competitiveness, and industry size factors. Results reveal that the energy efficiency factor significantly reduces the SAF production carbon footprint across all three pathways. The scalability factor was a dominant challenge that greatly influenced the carbon footprint of SAF production across global scenarios, especially for HEFA and AtJ, while for Australia the effects of the scalability factor were smaller though remain a noticeable challenge for AtJ. The decomposition results in Australia resemble mostly the high- and very high- SAF production scenarios globally. Results of a sensitivity analysis suggest that biomanufacturing potentially enhances emission reductions for various SAF feedstocks in both Australia and globally, particularly for oilseed-based pathways in Australia.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 30
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.