Axistase: A Structural Framework for Relational Asymmetry and Non-Transfer

Axistase — Application I: Relational Objectification This publication introduces Axistase as a structural and positional framework for identifying relational and systemic asymmetry without converting insight into interaction, explanation, or compensatory engagement. Axistase does not function as a method, intervention, therapeutic model, or ethical guideline. It articulates a terminating condition: the point at which continued movement toward the other—through dialogue, empathy, clarification, or moral effort—no longer corrects asymmetry but instead sustains it. This first application addresses relational objectification, not as intent or behavior, but as structure. Core phenomena include objectification as access, intermittent binding, explanatory labor, role reversal, gaslighting, the illusion of symmetry, and fractal repetition across relational and collective scales. The document is deliberately non-operational. It provides definitions, scope boundaries, and conceptual positioning without examples, prescriptions, or applications. Entry into Axistase is autonomous; non-entry entails no deficit. This work precedes and underlies forthcoming book publications in Dutch (scheduled within two weeks) and English (planned for March 2026), which elaborate these structures in embodied and contextual form. Keywords: Axistase, relational asymmetry, objectification, explanatory labor, role reversal, gaslighting, boundary collapse, positional frameworks, gendered labor, systemic ethics. Notes This document establishes conceptual position and authorship.It is not intended for implementation, adaptation, or derivative use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18379612
Primary Topic
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Axistase: A Structural Framework for Relational Asymmetry and Non-Transfer

Kristal M Peters
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
article

Axistase: A Structural Framework for Relational Asymmetry and Non-Transfer

Kristal M Peters
article en

Abstract

Axistase — Application I: Relational Objectification This publication introduces Axistase as a structural and positional framework for identifying relational and systemic asymmetry without converting insight into interaction, explanation, or compensatory engagement. Axistase does not function as a method, intervention, therapeutic model, or ethical guideline. It articulates a terminating condition: the point at which continued movement toward the other—through dialogue, empathy, clarification, or moral effort—no longer corrects asymmetry but instead sustains it. This first application addresses relational objectification, not as intent or behavior, but as structure. Core phenomena include objectification as access, intermittent binding, explanatory labor, role reversal, gaslighting, the illusion of symmetry, and fractal repetition across relational and collective scales. The document is deliberately non-operational. It provides definitions, scope boundaries, and conceptual positioning without examples, prescriptions, or applications. Entry into Axistase is autonomous; non-entry entails no deficit. This work precedes and underlies forthcoming book publications in Dutch (scheduled within two weeks) and English (planned for March 2026), which elaborate these structures in embodied and contextual form. Keywords: Axistase, relational asymmetry, objectification, explanatory labor, role reversal, gaslighting, boundary collapse, positional frameworks, gendered labor, systemic ethics. Notes This document establishes conceptual position and authorship.It is not intended for implementation, adaptation, or derivative use.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.