Precarious employment and mental health: the moderating role of household income and family type in Sweden

This study investigated the moderating role of household disposable income and family type on the association between precarious employment (PE) and diagnosed mental disorders. This longitudinal study used register data from the Swedish Work, Illness, and Labour-market Participation (SWIP) cohort. The study population included all individuals aged 27–65 who were employed in 2016 (n = 2,509,229). Precarious employment was measured using the Swedish Register-based Operationalization of Precarious Employment (SWE-ROPE 2.0), which captures employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and lack of rights and protection. Diagnosed mental disorders during 2017–2019 were identified through national inpatient, outpatient, and prescription registers. Household disposable income and family type (2016) were examined as moderators. Cox regression models estimated the effect of precarious employment on diagnosed mental disorders, with moderation assessed using two-way interaction terms. The risk of diagnosed mental disorders was higher among those in PE (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.18–1.23) compared with those in standard employment, across household income levels and family types. High household income was generally protective, but the interaction between PE and high income indicated that this protective effect was reduced for individuals in PE, both among men (interaction HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.43) and women (interaction HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13–1.38). Among women, family types other than “couple without children” amplified the effects of PE on diagnosed mental disorders. The interaction for single mothers (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14–1.42) showed that the combined effect of PE and single motherhood exceeded the sum of their separate effects. Higher household income does not fully buffer the negative impact of PE on diagnosed mental disorders, and the negative impact of PE appears stronger for women, especially mothers. The findings are most generalisable to contexts with similar welfare regimes and gender norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26259-x
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precarious employment and mental health: the moderating role of household income and family type in Sweden

Bertina Kreshpaj, Gun Wickart Johansson, Kim Bosmans, Kathryn Badarin et al.
BMC Public Health
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Precarious employment and mental health: the moderating role of household income and family type in Sweden

Bertina Kreshpaj, Gun Wickart Johansson, Kim Bosmans, Kathryn Badarin, Nuria Matilla‐Santander, Fabrizio Méndez-Rivero, Theo Bodin, Emelie Thern, Virginia Gunn, Signild Kvart, Per-Olof Östergren, Lluís Mangot-Sala, Amanda Aronsson
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the moderating role of household disposable income and family type on the association between precarious employment (PE) and diagnosed mental disorders. This longitudinal study used register data from the Swedish Work, Illness, and Labour-market Participation (SWIP) cohort. The study population included all individuals aged 27–65 who were employed in 2016 (n = 2,509,229). Precarious employment was measured using the Swedish Register-based Operationalization of Precarious Employment (SWE-ROPE 2.0), which captures employment insecurity, income inadequacy, and lack of rights and protection. Diagnosed mental disorders during 2017–2019 were identified through national inpatient, outpatient, and prescription registers. Household disposable income and family type (2016) were examined as moderators. Cox regression models estimated the effect of precarious employment on diagnosed mental disorders, with moderation assessed using two-way interaction terms. The risk of diagnosed mental disorders was higher among those in PE (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.18–1.23) compared with those in standard employment, across household income levels and family types. High household income was generally protective, but the interaction between PE and high income indicated that this protective effect was reduced for individuals in PE, both among men (interaction HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.43) and women (interaction HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13–1.38). Among women, family types other than “couple without children” amplified the effects of PE on diagnosed mental disorders. The interaction for single mothers (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14–1.42) showed that the combined effect of PE and single motherhood exceeded the sum of their separate effects. Higher household income does not fully buffer the negative impact of PE on diagnosed mental disorders, and the negative impact of PE appears stronger for women, especially mothers. The findings are most generalisable to contexts with similar welfare regimes and gender norms.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Cape Breton University (CA), University of Copenhagen (DK), Oxford Brookes University (GB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Lund University (SE), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UY), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Centre for Palaeogenetics (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.