KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module B: AI, trust and awareness – Consequences of AI-based technologies for the quality of public deliberation

Public deliberation relies on a set of fragile cognitive and social conditions: access to shared information, mutual recognition between interlocutors, and the possibility of engaging with opposing views in a constructive manner. Digital platforms – and increasingly AI-based systems that curate, generate, and recommend content – have profoundly reshaped these conditions. While these technologies have expanded access to information and lowered barriers to participation, they have also transformed the dynamics of attention, visibility, and interaction that structure public debate. This document examines how AI-driven content curation and recommendation systems affect the quality of public deliberation. Rather than focusing exclusively on misinformation or individual belief change, it analyses how emotionally charged content, polarisation dynamics, and choice architectures interact to shape communicative norms, mutual trust, and the capacity for collective reasoning. The goal is to identify not only the risks associated with current digital environments, but also the conditions under which AI-based technologies could support more reflective, inclusive, and constructive forms of public discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18376619
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module B: AI, trust and awareness – Consequences of AI-based technologies for the quality of public deliberation

Tiffany Morisseau
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module B: AI, trust and awareness – Consequences of AI-based technologies for the quality of public deliberation

Tiffany Morisseau
article en

Abstract

Public deliberation relies on a set of fragile cognitive and social conditions: access to shared information, mutual recognition between interlocutors, and the possibility of engaging with opposing views in a constructive manner. Digital platforms – and increasingly AI-based systems that curate, generate, and recommend content – have profoundly reshaped these conditions. While these technologies have expanded access to information and lowered barriers to participation, they have also transformed the dynamics of attention, visibility, and interaction that structure public debate. This document examines how AI-driven content curation and recommendation systems affect the quality of public deliberation. Rather than focusing exclusively on misinformation or individual belief change, it analyses how emotionally charged content, polarisation dynamics, and choice architectures interact to shape communicative norms, mutual trust, and the capacity for collective reasoning. The goal is to identify not only the risks associated with current digital environments, but also the conditions under which AI-based technologies could support more reflective, inclusive, and constructive forms of public discourse.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.