Impact of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage via different routes under CT guidance on obstructive jaundice

To compare the postoperative biochemical recovery and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) via left-lobe versus right-lobe approaches for malignant obstructive jaundice. In this single-center retrospective study, 254 patients were categorized into two groups based on the hepatic access route: the Left-Lobe Group (puncture via segments S2/S3, n = 136) and the Right-Lobe Group (puncture via segments S5/S6 or conventional right pathways, n = 118). The comparison encompassed technical success, procedure-related parameters (number of puncture attempts, fluoroscopy time, total procedure time, radiation dose), postoperative recovery (hospital stay, duration of pain), serial liver function tests (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase [GGT]) preoperatively and on days 3 and 7, and the incidence of procedure-related complications. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the drainage catheter into the target bile duct, confirmed by post-procedural cholangiography and established bile drainage. The Left-Lobe Group demonstrated a significantly higher technical success rate (89.71 % vs. 77.12 %, P = 0.007), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of 12.6 % (95 % CI: 3.5 %–21.7 %). Postoperatively, this group showed superior recovery: lower AST at 3 days (P = 0.019), lower direct bilirubin at 7 days (P < 0.001), greater decline rates in ALP (P = 0.003) and GGT (P = 0.003) at 7 days. Complication rates were also significantly lower for bile leak (5.88 % vs. 15.25 %, P = 0.014), catheter occlusion (2.94 % vs. 11.02 %, P = 0.010), and pleural effusion (0.74 % vs. 7.63 %, P = 0.013). No major complications (severe hemorrhage requiring intervention or procedure-related mortality) occurred in either group. The left-lobe approach for CT-guided PTBD may be associated with higher technical success, more effective and rapid improvement in liver function, and suggests a lower rate of specific minor complications compared to the right-lobe approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102185
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage via different routes under CT guidance on obstructive jaundice

Peng Zhou, Bo Chen, Zhixiang Xing, Zhida Long et al.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Impact of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage via different routes under CT guidance on obstructive jaundice

Peng Zhou, Bo Chen, Zhixiang Xing, Zhida Long, Chao Lu, Jiming Hu
article en

Abstract

To compare the postoperative biochemical recovery and complications of computed tomography (CT)-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) via left-lobe versus right-lobe approaches for malignant obstructive jaundice. In this single-center retrospective study, 254 patients were categorized into two groups based on the hepatic access route: the Left-Lobe Group (puncture via segments S2/S3, n = 136) and the Right-Lobe Group (puncture via segments S5/S6 or conventional right pathways, n = 118). The comparison encompassed technical success, procedure-related parameters (number of puncture attempts, fluoroscopy time, total procedure time, radiation dose), postoperative recovery (hospital stay, duration of pain), serial liver function tests (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase [GGT]) preoperatively and on days 3 and 7, and the incidence of procedure-related complications. Technical success was defined as successful placement of the drainage catheter into the target bile duct, confirmed by post-procedural cholangiography and established bile drainage. The Left-Lobe Group demonstrated a significantly higher technical success rate (89.71 % vs. 77.12 %, P = 0.007), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of 12.6 % (95 % CI: 3.5 %–21.7 %). Postoperatively, this group showed superior recovery: lower AST at 3 days (P = 0.019), lower direct bilirubin at 7 days (P < 0.001), greater decline rates in ALP (P = 0.003) and GGT (P = 0.003) at 7 days. Complication rates were also significantly lower for bile leak (5.88 % vs. 15.25 %, P = 0.014), catheter occlusion (2.94 % vs. 11.02 %, P = 0.010), and pleural effusion (0.74 % vs. 7.63 %, P = 0.013). No major complications (severe hemorrhage requiring intervention or procedure-related mortality) occurred in either group. The left-lobe approach for CT-guided PTBD may be associated with higher technical success, more effective and rapid improvement in liver function, and suggests a lower rate of specific minor complications compared to the right-lobe approach.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 19(1)
Yangtze University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.