Between Tradition and Critique: Lelewel, Schlözer, and the Transformation of Historical Method in the Late Enlightenment

Joachim Lelewel, a historian educated at the University of Vilnius, was one of the most significant representatives of the critical approach to historical sources in Polish historiography. August Ludwig Schlözer, a linguist, gained renown above all for his critical edition of the ‘Nestor Chronicle’, the final volume of which appeared just as Lelewel was beginning his academic career. This article examines how, and to what extent, Lelewel’s intellectual work in the critical analysis of historical sources was influenced by Schlözer’s methods. Through a close reading of Lelewel’s writings, it will be shown how he adopted categories developed by Schlözer, at times even employing them against Schlözer himself. Lelewel’s engagement with Schlözer not only reflects the wider Enlightenment debates on historical method, but also complicates simplified models of knowledge transfer between scholars from Western and Central-Eastern Europe.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lietuvos istorijos metraštis
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33918/25386549-202502003
Primary Topic
Central European national history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Tradition and Critique: Lelewel, Schlözer, and the Transformation of Historical Method in the Late Enlightenment

Aleksandra Kuligowska
Lietuvos istorijos metraštis
Central European national history
article

Between Tradition and Critique: Lelewel, Schlözer, and the Transformation of Historical Method in the Late Enlightenment

Aleksandra Kuligowska
article en

Abstract

Joachim Lelewel, a historian educated at the University of Vilnius, was one of the most significant representatives of the critical approach to historical sources in Polish historiography. August Ludwig Schlözer, a linguist, gained renown above all for his critical edition of the ‘Nestor Chronicle’, the final volume of which appeared just as Lelewel was beginning his academic career. This article examines how, and to what extent, Lelewel’s intellectual work in the critical analysis of historical sources was influenced by Schlözer’s methods. Through a close reading of Lelewel’s writings, it will be shown how he adopted categories developed by Schlözer, at times even employing them against Schlözer himself. Lelewel’s engagement with Schlözer not only reflects the wider Enlightenment debates on historical method, but also complicates simplified models of knowledge transfer between scholars from Western and Central-Eastern Europe.

Lietuvos istorijos metraštis
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Central European national history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.