An Indirect Comparison of Zanubrutinib vs Acalabrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Patients With Treatment-Naive CLL

In the phase 3 randomized SEQUOIA study (NCT03336333), zanubrutinib (arm A) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine-rituximab (BR; arm B) in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) without del(17p). In the phase 3 AMPLIFY study (NCT03836261), acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab demonstrated prolonged PFS vs chemoimmunotherapy (investigator's choice of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab [FCR] or BR) in patients with treatment-naive CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutations. Compared with AMPLIFY, the patient population in SEQUOIA was unsuitable for FCR and included patients with TP53 mutations. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients from SEQUOIA vs a clinically similar patient population treated with acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY. A numerically greater 3-year investigator-assessed PFS (PFS-INV) was observed with zanubrutinib (84.3%) in the SEQUOIA population acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY (78.9%). When matching SEQUOIA to the AMPLIFY population by FCR eligibility, a greater PFS benefit with zanubrutinib was reported (89.2% vs 78.9%, respectively). To support the comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax, an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was performed, which showed that zanubrutinib was associated with prolonged PFS-INV vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax when adjusted for various baseline characteristics. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated longer PFS whether adjusted for age (PFS-INV hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54; P<.0003) or unadjusted (PFS-INV HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P=.0197). These results highlight zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL, including patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Advances
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018536
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Indirect Comparison of Zanubrutinib vs Acalabrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Patients With Treatment-Naive CLL

Constantine S. Tam, Talha Munir, Jamie Hirata, Keri Yang et al.
Blood Advances
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
article

An Indirect Comparison of Zanubrutinib vs Acalabrutinib Plus Venetoclax in Patients With Treatment-Naive CLL

Constantine S. Tam, Talha Munir, Jamie Hirata, Keri Yang, Marcus Lefebure, Rhys Williams, Sheng Xu, Tian Tian, Mazyar Shadman, Danielle M Brander
article en

Abstract

In the phase 3 randomized SEQUOIA study (NCT03336333), zanubrutinib (arm A) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bendamustine-rituximab (BR; arm B) in patients with treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) without del(17p). In the phase 3 AMPLIFY study (NCT03836261), acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab demonstrated prolonged PFS vs chemoimmunotherapy (investigator's choice of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab [FCR] or BR) in patients with treatment-naive CLL without del(17p) or TP53 mutations. Compared with AMPLIFY, the patient population in SEQUOIA was unsuitable for FCR and included patients with TP53 mutations. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients from SEQUOIA vs a clinically similar patient population treated with acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY. A numerically greater 3-year investigator-assessed PFS (PFS-INV) was observed with zanubrutinib (84.3%) in the SEQUOIA population acalabrutinib-venetoclax in AMPLIFY (78.9%). When matching SEQUOIA to the AMPLIFY population by FCR eligibility, a greater PFS benefit with zanubrutinib was reported (89.2% vs 78.9%, respectively). To support the comparison of zanubrutinib vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax, an anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was performed, which showed that zanubrutinib was associated with prolonged PFS-INV vs acalabrutinib-venetoclax when adjusted for various baseline characteristics. Zanubrutinib also demonstrated longer PFS whether adjusted for age (PFS-INV hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54; P<.0003) or unadjusted (PFS-INV HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P=.0197). These results highlight zanubrutinib monotherapy as an effective treatment option for all patients with treatment-naive CLL/SLL, including patients who might otherwise be considered for more intensive fixed-duration combination regimens.

Blood Advances
Duke University (US), National University of Misiones (AR), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Hypetex (United Kingdom) (GB), Duke Medical Center (US), Danone (China) (CN), Universidad San Carlos (PY), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.