Assessment of three removal methods for an invasive lizard, Peters’ rock agama (Agama picticauda)

Peters’ rock agamas ( Agama picticauda ) are petrophilic lizards native to Western sub-Saharan Africa and are established in multiple areas in Florida. Where established, this species is conspicuous and numerous and has been the top reported non-native reptile to Florida’s state wildlife agency, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, since 2021. There is a need to identify effective removal methods that can be applied in different habitats and by homeowners and professionals in both public and private lands. We evaluated three removal methods for A. picticauda in Martin County, Florida, USA. Using a before-after-control-impact design, we evaluated targeted removals by lizard-fishing (baited line on the end of an extendable pole), air rifle, and fabric minnow traps baited with crickets at three sites per treatment across two seasons (fall 2024 and spring 2025) compared to control sites with no removal treatment applied. Each method was applied to each site for two 1-h treatments per season. We observed population reductions at all sites after removal treatments during the warm season. Air rifle was the most effective method in terms of the number of lizards removed, effort, and cost efficiency, but the limited temporal application of 2-h removal effort per site per season was not enough to distinguish population reduction potential among methods. Our calculated prescribed take levels of approximately 30% of the average population estimates are reasonable to achieve based on current routine removal efforts. This information may be applicable to other management efforts on small invasive lizards and may be informative for non-lethal capture efforts of similar lizard species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/famrs.2026.1699230
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of three removal methods for an invasive lizard, Peters’ rock agama (Agama picticauda)

Parker T. Hall, Bryan M. Kluever, Christina M. Romagosa, Natalie M. Claunch et al.
Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile Science
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Assessment of three removal methods for an invasive lizard, Peters’ rock agama (Agama picticauda)

Parker T. Hall, Bryan M. Kluever, Christina M. Romagosa, Natalie M. Claunch, Jake R. Edwards, Frank F. Rivera‐Milán, Alex Nicely, Matthew Legare
article en

Abstract

Peters’ rock agamas ( Agama picticauda ) are petrophilic lizards native to Western sub-Saharan Africa and are established in multiple areas in Florida. Where established, this species is conspicuous and numerous and has been the top reported non-native reptile to Florida’s state wildlife agency, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, since 2021. There is a need to identify effective removal methods that can be applied in different habitats and by homeowners and professionals in both public and private lands. We evaluated three removal methods for A. picticauda in Martin County, Florida, USA. Using a before-after-control-impact design, we evaluated targeted removals by lizard-fishing (baited line on the end of an extendable pole), air rifle, and fabric minnow traps baited with crickets at three sites per treatment across two seasons (fall 2024 and spring 2025) compared to control sites with no removal treatment applied. Each method was applied to each site for two 1-h treatments per season. We observed population reductions at all sites after removal treatments during the warm season. Air rifle was the most effective method in terms of the number of lizards removed, effort, and cost efficiency, but the limited temporal application of 2-h removal effort per site per season was not enough to distinguish population reduction potential among methods. Our calculated prescribed take levels of approximately 30% of the average population estimates are reasonable to achieve based on current routine removal efforts. This information may be applicable to other management efforts on small invasive lizards and may be informative for non-lethal capture efforts of similar lizard species.

Frontiers in Amphibian and Reptile ScienceVol. 4
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), University of Florida (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.