Passive data do not improve prediction or detection of alcohol consumption beyond temporal patterns in major depression: A 90-day cross-validated study

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychological disorders and frequently co-occurs with alcohol use disorders, increasing the risk of functional impairment. Monitoring alcohol use during depression treatment is therefore critical for early intervention. Passively collected data via devices like smartphones and smartwatches, offers a low-burden method for monitoring behavior in real time. This study investigated whether deep learning models trained on passively collected data (i.e., accelerometer, heart rate, respiratory rate, screen usage, and GPS data) could detect and predict alcohol use in individuals with MDD. Data were collected from 300 clinically depressed individuals who were enrolled in the Tracking Depression Study, a 90-day longitudinal study. Participants self-reported their alcohol use every week by completing the Timeline FollowBack. We trained models to predict same-day and next-day alcohol use. To validate these models, we split the data by participant, so that predictions were made on individuals who were not included in the training set. The models achieved moderate performance (mean AUC = 0.67 for both prediction tasks) when capturing both interindividual (between-person) and intraindividual (within-person) variability. Similar performances were observed when evaluating the model exclusively on predicting intraindividual variability (AUCs = 0.69 same-day, 0.68 next-day). However, model performance remained comparable to a baseline using only the day of week as predictor. These findings suggest that much of the predictive signal derives from temporal patterns. This indicates that interventions aligned with such temporal cues may already be effective, and that the added value of our model appears limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addictive Behaviors
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108624
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive data do not improve prediction or detection of alcohol consumption beyond temporal patterns in major depression: A 90-day cross-validated study

Arvind Pillai, Damien Lekkas, Daniel M. Mackin, Amanda C Collins et al.
Addictive Behaviors
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Passive data do not improve prediction or detection of alcohol consumption beyond temporal patterns in major depression: A 90-day cross-validated study

Arvind Pillai, Damien Lekkas, Daniel M. Mackin, Amanda C Collins, Andrew T. Campbell, Subigya Nepal, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Matthew D. Nemesure, Dawson Haddox, Anna M. Langener, George D. Price, Michael V. Heinz, Tess Z. Griffin
article en

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent psychological disorders and frequently co-occurs with alcohol use disorders, increasing the risk of functional impairment. Monitoring alcohol use during depression treatment is therefore critical for early intervention. Passively collected data via devices like smartphones and smartwatches, offers a low-burden method for monitoring behavior in real time. This study investigated whether deep learning models trained on passively collected data (i.e., accelerometer, heart rate, respiratory rate, screen usage, and GPS data) could detect and predict alcohol use in individuals with MDD. Data were collected from 300 clinically depressed individuals who were enrolled in the Tracking Depression Study, a 90-day longitudinal study. Participants self-reported their alcohol use every week by completing the Timeline FollowBack. We trained models to predict same-day and next-day alcohol use. To validate these models, we split the data by participant, so that predictions were made on individuals who were not included in the training set. The models achieved moderate performance (mean AUC = 0.67 for both prediction tasks) when capturing both interindividual (between-person) and intraindividual (within-person) variability. Similar performances were observed when evaluating the model exclusively on predicting intraindividual variability (AUCs = 0.69 same-day, 0.68 next-day). However, model performance remained comparable to a baseline using only the day of week as predictor. These findings suggest that much of the predictive signal derives from temporal patterns. This indicates that interventions aligned with such temporal cues may already be effective, and that the added value of our model appears limited.

Addictive BehaviorsVol. 175
Dartmouth College (US), Northwestern University (US), Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US), University of Arizona (US), Palo Alto University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.