Crossflow CO <sub>2</sub> Absorber Design for Gas-Fired Combined Cycles

Crossflow CO2 absorbers were designed for a 110 MW Natural Gas Combined Cycle power plant with a height limitation of 7 m. Five molal piperazine (PZ) (30 wt %) was simulated in Aspen Plus with a lean solvent loading of 0.2 mol CO2/equiv N at 90% CO2 removal. A simple absorber and an absorber with pump-around intercooling were modeled. All configurations used a crossflow water wash to maintain the water balance around the absorber. Sulzer MellapakPlus 252Y structured packing was used. All crossflow configurations underperformed compared to analogous countercurrent designs. An analysis of the interfacial temperature and CO2 flux profiles showed that crossflow absorbers developed multiple mass transfer pinches and CO2 stripping by the flue gas, despite the relatively low temperature. These represent a fundamental shortcoming unique to the crossflow absorber. If performance costs can be tolerated, crossflow can be attractive alternative to countercurrent units when height constraints are present.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02968
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crossflow CO 2 Absorber Design for Gas-Fired Combined Cycles

Gary T. Rochelle, Miguel Abreu
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Crossflow CO 2 Absorber Design for Gas-Fired Combined Cycles

Gary T. Rochelle, Miguel Abreu
article en

Abstract

Crossflow CO2 absorbers were designed for a 110 MW Natural Gas Combined Cycle power plant with a height limitation of 7 m. Five molal piperazine (PZ) (30 wt %) was simulated in Aspen Plus with a lean solvent loading of 0.2 mol CO2/equiv N at 90% CO2 removal. A simple absorber and an absorber with pump-around intercooling were modeled. All configurations used a crossflow water wash to maintain the water balance around the absorber. Sulzer MellapakPlus 252Y structured packing was used. All crossflow configurations underperformed compared to analogous countercurrent designs. An analysis of the interfacial temperature and CO2 flux profiles showed that crossflow absorbers developed multiple mass transfer pinches and CO2 stripping by the flue gas, despite the relatively low temperature. These represent a fundamental shortcoming unique to the crossflow absorber. If performance costs can be tolerated, crossflow can be attractive alternative to countercurrent units when height constraints are present.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 65(4)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crossflow CO <sub>2</sub> Absorber Design for Gas-Fired Combined Cycles — Gary T. Rochelle, Miguel Abreu · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS