The Surrender of Children under the European Arrest Warrant in a Nordic Perspective

This article examines the legal challenges surrounding the surrender of minors under the European and Nordic Arrest Warrants. It argues that the principle of mutual trust, which is central to the effectiveness of both instruments, may be strained when the requested person is a child, given the differing national approaches to criminal responsibility and child protection. The article analyses the implications of the CJEU’s judgment in Piotrowski for the interpretation of Article 3(3) of the European Arrest Warrant and considers how Sweden’s proposal to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 13 for certain serious crimes may be affected by this interpretation. It further explores how fundamental rights considerations under Articles 4 and 24 of the Charter may require child-specific assessments by executing judicial authorities. Finally, the article highlights the potential tension created by Denmark’s opt-out with regard to the surrender of minors to Denmark.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v13i3.4834
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Surrender of Children under the European Arrest Warrant in a Nordic Perspective

Søren Arvig Verdoner
Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

The Surrender of Children under the European Arrest Warrant in a Nordic Perspective

Søren Arvig Verdoner
article en

Abstract

This article examines the legal challenges surrounding the surrender of minors under the European and Nordic Arrest Warrants. It argues that the principle of mutual trust, which is central to the effectiveness of both instruments, may be strained when the requested person is a child, given the differing national approaches to criminal responsibility and child protection. The article analyses the implications of the CJEU’s judgment in Piotrowski for the interpretation of Article 3(3) of the European Arrest Warrant and considers how Sweden’s proposal to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 13 for certain serious crimes may be affected by this interpretation. It further explores how fundamental rights considerations under Articles 4 and 24 of the Charter may require child-specific assessments by executing judicial authorities. Finally, the article highlights the potential tension created by Denmark’s opt-out with regard to the surrender of minors to Denmark.

Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal JusticeVol. 13(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.