Patient Comfort Assessment of Intraoral Scanners

Aim: This clinical study aimed to assess the comfort level between two intraoral scanners by comparing satisfaction scores from 30 patients who underwent full arch scans of their upper and lower jaws. Materials and Method: A total of 30 participants, consisting of two groups who had received bleaching treatment by a dentist in the last 6 months (n=15) and who never had a bleaching treatment before (n=15), were examined using two scanners with different designs and features (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark; CEREC Omnicam, Dentsply Sirona, Germany). Upper and lower jaw scans were conducted by a single clinician with 4 years of clinical experience, simultaneously on two consecutive days with a 24-hour interval, under identical clinical conditions. After completing intraoral scans, participants scored for scanners in a 6-parameter comfort questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert satisfaction scale (5: very satisfied, 1: very dissatisfied). The comfort parameters were: 1-lingual discomfort, 2-buccal discomfort, 3-tooth discomfort, 4-mouth opening discomfort, 5-scanning time, and 6-general satisfaction. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at p0.050). Likewise, no significant differences were found for any parameter between participants who had received bleaching treatment and those who had not (p>0.050). Conclusion: The different scanner designs or features of intraoral scanners with constantly developing technologies do not affect patient comfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Dental Sciences
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17567/currresdentsci.1474109
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Comfort Assessment of Intraoral Scanners

Bengü Doğu Kaya, Bilge Tarçın, Pınar Yılmaz Atalı, Erkut Kahramanoğlu et al.
Current Research in Dental Sciences
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Patient Comfort Assessment of Intraoral Scanners

Bengü Doğu Kaya, Bilge Tarçın, Pınar Yılmaz Atalı, Erkut Kahramanoğlu, Ayşe Aslı Şenol
article en

Abstract

Aim: This clinical study aimed to assess the comfort level between two intraoral scanners by comparing satisfaction scores from 30 patients who underwent full arch scans of their upper and lower jaws. Materials and Method: A total of 30 participants, consisting of two groups who had received bleaching treatment by a dentist in the last 6 months (n=15) and who never had a bleaching treatment before (n=15), were examined using two scanners with different designs and features (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark; CEREC Omnicam, Dentsply Sirona, Germany). Upper and lower jaw scans were conducted by a single clinician with 4 years of clinical experience, simultaneously on two consecutive days with a 24-hour interval, under identical clinical conditions. After completing intraoral scans, participants scored for scanners in a 6-parameter comfort questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert satisfaction scale (5: very satisfied, 1: very dissatisfied). The comfort parameters were: 1-lingual discomfort, 2-buccal discomfort, 3-tooth discomfort, 4-mouth opening discomfort, 5-scanning time, and 6-general satisfaction. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. The significance level was set at p0.050). Likewise, no significant differences were found for any parameter between participants who had received bleaching treatment and those who had not (p>0.050). Conclusion: The different scanner designs or features of intraoral scanners with constantly developing technologies do not affect patient comfort.

Current Research in Dental SciencesVol. 36(1)
Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient Comfort Assessment of Intraoral Scanners — Bengü Doğu Kaya, Bilge Tarçın, et al. · Current Research in Dental Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS