Bridging the Implementation Gap in AI-Powered Personalized Education: A Systematic Review of Learning Style Prediction and Recommendation Systems

The integration of artificial intelligence into education has driven growing interest in predicting student learning styles and developing recommendation systems that personalize learning pathways. While previous reviews examined these domains, most focus on pre-2023 research, overlooking recent methodological shifts. We conduct a systematic literature review of 40 studies published between 2017 and 2025, with emphasis on publications from 2023 to 2025 (70% of reviewed studies). Our analysis identifies three qualitative shifts: adoption of ensemble and deep learning methods over single classifiers, emergence of multimodal inputs including physiological signals, and evolution from isolated prediction to integrated adaptive systems. Beyond methodological synthesis, this review critically examines factors underlying observed trends and barriers to deployment. The Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model dominates research (58.3%) due to historical path dependency and instrument availability rather than demonstrated pedagogical superiority. While ensemble methods achieve high reported accuracy (87–98%), methodological concerns emerge: 65% of studies employ random rather than temporal validation, potentially inflating performance, and only 23% address production-level requirements, including privacy, scalability, and integration. We systematically analyze implementation barriers spanning computational requirements, LMS integration, educator acceptance, ethical considerations, and scalability—revealing that the gap between research prototypes and deployable systems remains substantial. Our contributions include a stakeholder impact framework, evaluation metrics taxonomy, critical analysis of reported performance claims, and identification of five research gaps with actionable recommendations. This review offers researchers and practitioners both a comprehensive synthesis of advances and a critical roadmap for bridging the implementation gap in AI-powered personalized education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7020041
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Implementation Gap in AI-Powered Personalized Education: A Systematic Review of Learning Style Prediction and Recommendation Systems

Hamidreza Salarian, Maryam Khanian Najafabadi, Claudia Choi, Saman Shojae Chaeikar et al.
AI
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Bridging the Implementation Gap in AI-Powered Personalized Education: A Systematic Review of Learning Style Prediction and Recommendation Systems

Hamidreza Salarian, Maryam Khanian Najafabadi, Claudia Choi, Saman Shojae Chaeikar, Katholiki Kritharides
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into education has driven growing interest in predicting student learning styles and developing recommendation systems that personalize learning pathways. While previous reviews examined these domains, most focus on pre-2023 research, overlooking recent methodological shifts. We conduct a systematic literature review of 40 studies published between 2017 and 2025, with emphasis on publications from 2023 to 2025 (70% of reviewed studies). Our analysis identifies three qualitative shifts: adoption of ensemble and deep learning methods over single classifiers, emergence of multimodal inputs including physiological signals, and evolution from isolated prediction to integrated adaptive systems. Beyond methodological synthesis, this review critically examines factors underlying observed trends and barriers to deployment. The Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model dominates research (58.3%) due to historical path dependency and instrument availability rather than demonstrated pedagogical superiority. While ensemble methods achieve high reported accuracy (87–98%), methodological concerns emerge: 65% of studies employ random rather than temporal validation, potentially inflating performance, and only 23% address production-level requirements, including privacy, scalability, and integration. We systematically analyze implementation barriers spanning computational requirements, LMS integration, educator acceptance, ethical considerations, and scalability—revealing that the gap between research prototypes and deployable systems remains substantial. Our contributions include a stakeholder impact framework, evaluation metrics taxonomy, critical analysis of reported performance claims, and identification of five research gaps with actionable recommendations. This review offers researchers and practitioners both a comprehensive synthesis of advances and a critical roadmap for bridging the implementation gap in AI-powered personalized education.

AIVol. 7(2)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.