Neural network reconstruction of the DIII-D tokamak plasma boundary using a reduced set of diagnostics

This study investigates the feasibility of reconstructing the last closed flux surface in the DIII-D tokamak using neural network models trained on reduced input feature sets, addressing an ill-posed task. Two models are compared: one trained solely on coil currents and another incorporating coil currents, plasma current and loop voltage. The model trained exclusively on coil currents achieved a mean point displacement of $0.04$ m on a held-out test set, while the inclusion of plasma current and loop voltage reduced the error to $0.03$ m. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between input feature complexity and reconstruction accuracy, demonstrating the potential of machine learning algorithms to perform effectively in data-limited environments, such as those expected in fusion power plants due to diagnostic constraints imposed by the presence of blankets and shielding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plasma Physics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022377825100962
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural network reconstruction of the DIII-D tokamak plasma boundary using a reduced set of diagnostics

Dmitry Sorokin, Randall Clark, Evgeny Adishchev, Ivan Kharitonov et al.
Journal of Plasma Physics
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Neural network reconstruction of the DIII-D tokamak plasma boundary using a reduced set of diagnostics

Dmitry Sorokin, Randall Clark, Evgeny Adishchev, Ivan Kharitonov, Maxim Nurgaliev, Dmitri Orlov, Maksim Stokolesov
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of reconstructing the last closed flux surface in the DIII-D tokamak using neural network models trained on reduced input feature sets, addressing an ill-posed task. Two models are compared: one trained solely on coil currents and another incorporating coil currents, plasma current and loop voltage. The model trained exclusively on coil currents achieved a mean point displacement of $0.04$ m on a held-out test set, while the inclusion of plasma current and loop voltage reduced the error to $0.03$ m. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between input feature complexity and reconstruction accuracy, demonstrating the potential of machine learning algorithms to perform effectively in data-limited environments, such as those expected in fusion power plants due to diagnostic constraints imposed by the presence of blankets and shielding.

Journal of Plasma PhysicsVol. 91(6)
Nexen (Canada) (CA), University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.