Corrigendum: Integrating or tailoring? Optimizing touchpoints for enhanced omnichannel customer experience

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article by Yin C (2025), “Integrating or tailoring? Optimizing touchpoints for enhanced omnichannel customer experience,” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 6 pp. 1001-1017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2023-0418, contains two typographical errors in the published version related to table referencing and a numerical value.On page 7, the sentence currently referring to “Table 2” should instead refer to “Table 1” and should read as, “As shown in Table 1, the results showed high internal consistency for each construct, with alpha values above 0.81 for all constructs (see Table 1)”.Additionally, on page 8, in Table 1, the CR value for Emotional Experience is incorrectly listed as 0.081, whereas the correct value is 0.81.These errors were not identified during the proofing stage. The publisher reminds authors to carefully check table references and numerical values at the proofing stage to avoid such errors.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-12-2025-0765
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corrigendum: Integrating or tailoring? Optimizing touchpoints for enhanced omnichannel customer experience

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Corrigendum: Integrating or tailoring? Optimizing touchpoints for enhanced omnichannel customer experience

article en

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article by Yin C (2025), “Integrating or tailoring? Optimizing touchpoints for enhanced omnichannel customer experience,” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 6 pp. 1001-1017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-11-2023-0418, contains two typographical errors in the published version related to table referencing and a numerical value.On page 7, the sentence currently referring to “Table 2” should instead refer to “Table 1” and should read as, “As shown in Table 1, the results showed high internal consistency for each construct, with alpha values above 0.81 for all constructs (see Table 1)”.Additionally, on page 8, in Table 1, the CR value for Emotional Experience is incorrectly listed as 0.081, whereas the correct value is 0.81.These errors were not identified during the proofing stage. The publisher reminds authors to carefully check table references and numerical values at the proofing stage to avoid such errors.

Journal of Research in Interactive MarketingVol. 20(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.