Ideological engineering against a postmaterialist shift: China’s pro-democratic but regime-supporting generations

Have decades of socioeconomic modernisation led to a pro-democratic cultural shift in China? Some contend that China’s cultural change aligns with the postmaterialist theory, suggesting recent generations are more supportive of democracy, while others find the political socialisation theory compelling, claiming that younger generations are less pro-democratic. This article contributes to the ongoing debate by providing refined conceptualisations of political values and attitudes. Our analysis of the 2011, 2016, and 2019 waves of the Asian Barometer Survey data uncovers a dual dynamic: younger, postmaterialist generations exhibit stronger democratic values , while simultaneously demonstrating greater support for the current regime and weaker endorsement of competitive elections (i.e. weaker democratic attitudes ). This paradox suggests that the democracy-promoting effects of socioeconomic modernisation coexist with regime-supporting effects of China’s evolving political/ideological environment. We highlight the possibility that the success of China’s recent ideological engineering may ultimately hinge on the regime’s capacity to deliver democratic goods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957251407286
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideological engineering against a postmaterialist shift: China’s pro-democratic but regime-supporting generations

Zhengxu Wang, Leqing Yang
Politics
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Ideological engineering against a postmaterialist shift: China’s pro-democratic but regime-supporting generations

Zhengxu Wang, Leqing Yang
article en

Abstract

Have decades of socioeconomic modernisation led to a pro-democratic cultural shift in China? Some contend that China’s cultural change aligns with the postmaterialist theory, suggesting recent generations are more supportive of democracy, while others find the political socialisation theory compelling, claiming that younger generations are less pro-democratic. This article contributes to the ongoing debate by providing refined conceptualisations of political values and attitudes. Our analysis of the 2011, 2016, and 2019 waves of the Asian Barometer Survey data uncovers a dual dynamic: younger, postmaterialist generations exhibit stronger democratic values , while simultaneously demonstrating greater support for the current regime and weaker endorsement of competitive elections (i.e. weaker democratic attitudes ). This paradox suggests that the democracy-promoting effects of socioeconomic modernisation coexist with regime-supporting effects of China’s evolving political/ideological environment. We highlight the possibility that the success of China’s recent ideological engineering may ultimately hinge on the regime’s capacity to deliver democratic goods.

Politics
Fudan University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.