Forest Age Estimation by Integrating Tree Species Identity and Multi-Source Remote Sensing: Validating Heterogeneous Growth Patterns Through the Plant Economic Spectrum Theory

Current mainstream remote sensing approaches to forest age estimation frequently neglect interspecific differences in functional traits, which may limit the accurate representation of species-specific tree growth strategies. This study develops and validates a technical framework that incorporates multi-source remote sensing and tree species functional trait heterogeneity to systematically improve the accuracy of plantation age mapping. We constructed a processing chain—“multi-source feature fusion–species identification–heterogeneity modeling”—for a typical karst plantation landscape in southeastern Yunnan. Using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, we integrated Sentinel-1/2 and Landsat time-series data, implemented a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm for species classification, and built age estimation models that incorporate species identity as a proxy for the growth strategy heterogeneity delineated by the Plant Economic Spectrum (PES) theory. Key results indicate: (1) Species classification reached an overall accuracy of 89.34% under spatial block cross-validation, establishing a reliable basis for subsequent modeling. (2) The operational model incorporating species information achieved an R2 (coefficient of determination) of 0.84 (RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) = 6.52 years) on the test set, demonstrating a substantial improvement over the baseline model that ignored species heterogeneity (R2 = 0.62). This demonstrates that species identity serves as an effective proxy for capturing the growth strategy heterogeneity described by the Plant Economic Spectrum (PES) theory, which is both distinguishable and valuable for modeling within the remote sensing feature space. (3) Error propagation analysis demonstrated strong robustness to classification uncertainties (γ = 0.23). (4) Plantation structure in the region was predominantly young-aged, with forests aged 0–20 years covering over 70% of the area. Despite inherent uncertainties in ground-reference age data, the integrated framework exhibited clear relative superiority, improving R2 from 0.62 to 0.84. Both error propagation analysis (γ = 0.23) and Monte Carlo simulations affirmed the robustness of the tandem workflow and the stability of the findings, providing a reliable methodology for improved-accuracy plantation carbon sink quantification.