A Hybrid Physics–Machine Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment with an Improved Non–Landslide Sampling Strategy

Rainfall–triggered clustered landslides pose severe risks to communities and infrastructure in mountainous regions. High–precision susceptibility assessment is essential for early warning and hazard mitigation. The traditional buffering method neglects physical slope stability mechanisms, leading to the misclassification of potentially unstable areas. To improve susceptibility model accuracy, we propose an improved non–landslide sampling strategy that integrates the physical–model TRIGRS (Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid–based Regional Slope–Stability Model) with 50 m buffering constraints. A hybrid physics–machine learning framework is used to evaluate the performance of landslide susceptibility assessment across four machine learning models, such as Multi–Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Among the four models, the TRIGRS model integrated with MLP achieves the highest accuracy in susceptibility mapping. The improved non–landslide sampling strategy increased average Area Under the Curve (AUC) by 16.46% in random cross–validation and improved spatial generalization capability by 29% in spatial cross–validation, demonstrating its robustness in unseen areas. SHAP factor analysis further confirms rainfall, groundwater table, and human activity as the primary influencing factors, which aligns with physical mechanisms and improves model interpretability. Therefore, the proposed non–landslide sampling strategy coupled with the TRIGRS and MLP models outperforms traditional buffering method in evaluating regional landslide susceptibility, providing a more physically basis for geohazard risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030408
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hybrid Physics–Machine Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment with an Improved Non–Landslide Sampling Strategy

Pinliang Li, L. S. L. Kong, Shihao Xiao, Dalei Peng et al.
Remote Sensing
Landslides and related hazards
article

A Hybrid Physics–Machine Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment with an Improved Non–Landslide Sampling Strategy

Pinliang Li, L. S. L. Kong, Shihao Xiao, Dalei Peng, Yuyang Shen, Qiang Xu, Boren Tan, Yeping Zhou, Maoyuan Chen
article en

Abstract

Rainfall–triggered clustered landslides pose severe risks to communities and infrastructure in mountainous regions. High–precision susceptibility assessment is essential for early warning and hazard mitigation. The traditional buffering method neglects physical slope stability mechanisms, leading to the misclassification of potentially unstable areas. To improve susceptibility model accuracy, we propose an improved non–landslide sampling strategy that integrates the physical–model TRIGRS (Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid–based Regional Slope–Stability Model) with 50 m buffering constraints. A hybrid physics–machine learning framework is used to evaluate the performance of landslide susceptibility assessment across four machine learning models, such as Multi–Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Among the four models, the TRIGRS model integrated with MLP achieves the highest accuracy in susceptibility mapping. The improved non–landslide sampling strategy increased average Area Under the Curve (AUC) by 16.46% in random cross–validation and improved spatial generalization capability by 29% in spatial cross–validation, demonstrating its robustness in unseen areas. SHAP factor analysis further confirms rainfall, groundwater table, and human activity as the primary influencing factors, which aligns with physical mechanisms and improves model interpretability. Therefore, the proposed non–landslide sampling strategy coupled with the TRIGRS and MLP models outperforms traditional buffering method in evaluating regional landslide susceptibility, providing a more physically basis for geohazard risk assessment.

Remote SensingVol. 18(3)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.