Architecting the Third Dimension of Electrochemical Energy Storage

Three-dimensional (3D) architectural design has emerged as a powerful strategy to push electrochemical energy storage (EES) devices beyond the intrinsic limitations of conventional two-dimensional (2D) electrodes. While planar architectures enable high packing density and mature manufacturing, they suffer from limited ion transport and low active-material loading. In contrast, 3D architectures introduce low-tortuosity networks and high surface area that enhance charge and mass transport while supporting thick, high mass-loading electrodes. However, their practicality remains hindered by challenges in volumetric density, mechanical stability, and large-scale manufacturability. This Perspective examines the key evaluation and design principles that govern 3D device performance. We discuss the fundamental trade-offs between porosity, volumetric density, and mechanical stability that shape 3D design and highlight emerging strategies for integrating materials engineering, structural optimization, device integration, computational modeling, and scalable manufacturing. By aligning structural functionality with manufacturability, 3D architectures can evolve from laboratory prototypes to commercially viable energy storage systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Energy Letters
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c03653
Primary Topic
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecting the Third Dimension of Electrochemical Energy Storage

Xinzhe Xue, Cheng Zhu, Yat Li, Marcus A. Worsley et al.
ACS Energy Letters
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
article

Architecting the Third Dimension of Electrochemical Energy Storage

Xinzhe Xue, Cheng Zhu, Yat Li, Marcus A. Worsley, Swetha Chandrasekaran
article en

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) architectural design has emerged as a powerful strategy to push electrochemical energy storage (EES) devices beyond the intrinsic limitations of conventional two-dimensional (2D) electrodes. While planar architectures enable high packing density and mature manufacturing, they suffer from limited ion transport and low active-material loading. In contrast, 3D architectures introduce low-tortuosity networks and high surface area that enhance charge and mass transport while supporting thick, high mass-loading electrodes. However, their practicality remains hindered by challenges in volumetric density, mechanical stability, and large-scale manufacturability. This Perspective examines the key evaluation and design principles that govern 3D device performance. We discuss the fundamental trade-offs between porosity, volumetric density, and mechanical stability that shape 3D design and highlight emerging strategies for integrating materials engineering, structural optimization, device integration, computational modeling, and scalable manufacturing. By aligning structural functionality with manufacturability, 3D architectures can evolve from laboratory prototypes to commercially viable energy storage systems.

ACS Energy LettersVol. 11(3)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.