Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background:</b> Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the preferred anticoagulant over vitamin K antagonists for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Variability in drug exposure raises concerns about bleeding and thrombotic events, highlighting the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). <b>Methods:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to May 2025) and identified studies reporting DOAC levels and clinical outcomes. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2.0, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Random-effects meta-analytical models generated pooled estimates, with meta-regression exploring potential sources of variability (DOAC type, drug levels) and exposure-response relationships. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen studies comprising 5770 patients were included in the review. The pooled event rates were 8% for major bleeding (95% CI: 0.05-0.11), 7% for thrombotic events (95% CI: 0.05-0.09), and 3% for mortality (95% CI: 0.03-0.04). Heterogeneity was substantial for bleeding and thrombotic events (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95.6% and 87.3%, respectively) but negligible for mortality (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Meta-regression analyses showed no significant association between mean DOAC concentration and either major bleeding (β = -0.00021, <i>p</i> = 0.35, Adj R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0%) or thrombotic events (β = 0.00005, <i>p</i> = 0.78, Adj R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0%), indicating that variations in measured plasma levels did not meaningfully explain event rate differences across studies. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this systematic review and meta-analysis, measured DOAC concentrations show limited and inconsistent association with clinical outcomes. While the present synthesis does not demonstrate a statistically robust linear correlation between DOAC plasma concentrations and adverse outcomes, it highlights the multifactorial determinants of bleeding and thrombosis risk underscores the potential value of selective TDM in individualized care. Further prospective, standardized studies are needed to define clinically actionable thresholds and to validate TDM-guided strategies that optimize the delicate balance between safety and efficacy in DOAC therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020215
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ibrahim Mohamed, Ibrahim Y. Abubeker, Rasha Abduljabbar, Sharoma J Yesukumar et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ibrahim Mohamed, Ibrahim Y. Abubeker, Rasha Abduljabbar, Sharoma J Yesukumar, Mohammed I. Danjuma, Layaly Bakir
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the preferred anticoagulant over vitamin K antagonists for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Variability in drug exposure raises concerns about bleeding and thrombotic events, highlighting the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). <b>Methods:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to May 2025) and identified studies reporting DOAC levels and clinical outcomes. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment (RoB 2.0, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). Random-effects meta-analytical models generated pooled estimates, with meta-regression exploring potential sources of variability (DOAC type, drug levels) and exposure-response relationships. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen studies comprising 5770 patients were included in the review. The pooled event rates were 8% for major bleeding (95% CI: 0.05-0.11), 7% for thrombotic events (95% CI: 0.05-0.09), and 3% for mortality (95% CI: 0.03-0.04). Heterogeneity was substantial for bleeding and thrombotic events (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95.6% and 87.3%, respectively) but negligible for mortality (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Meta-regression analyses showed no significant association between mean DOAC concentration and either major bleeding (β = -0.00021, <i>p</i> = 0.35, Adj R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0%) or thrombotic events (β = 0.00005, <i>p</i> = 0.78, Adj R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0%), indicating that variations in measured plasma levels did not meaningfully explain event rate differences across studies. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this systematic review and meta-analysis, measured DOAC concentrations show limited and inconsistent association with clinical outcomes. While the present synthesis does not demonstrate a statistically robust linear correlation between DOAC plasma concentrations and adverse outcomes, it highlights the multifactorial determinants of bleeding and thrombosis risk underscores the potential value of selective TDM in individualized care. Further prospective, standardized studies are needed to define clinically actionable thresholds and to validate TDM-guided strategies that optimize the delicate balance between safety and efficacy in DOAC therapy.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 19(2)
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Nottingham (GB), WinnMed (US), Hamad General Hospital (QA), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.