Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication: Media Narratives of Delegitimisation

Disinformation has become established as a strategic tool in political communication, with the capacity to erode public trust and undermine democratic quality. In an information environment increasingly mediated by artificial intelligence, it is essential to understand how the media articulates disinformation discursively. This study analyses, using a mixed design of quantitative and qualitative content analysis, 178 articles published in the five main Spanish digital newspapers (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, El Español and Eldiario.es), comparing the treatment of two cases of alleged political corruption. The results show significant differences in volume, journalistic genre, tone, framing, and use of disinformation terminology, confirming that the media do not act as neutral transmitters but rather as discursive actors that use disinformation lexicon for the purposes of attack, defence, or ideological legitimisation. There is also a predominance of emotional tones and rhetorical strategies that favour polarisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020063
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication: Media Narratives of Delegitimisation

Francisco Marcos Martín-Martín, Nereida Cea, María Jesús Fernández Torres
Social Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication: Media Narratives of Delegitimisation

Francisco Marcos Martín-Martín, Nereida Cea, María Jesús Fernández Torres
article en

Abstract

Disinformation has become established as a strategic tool in political communication, with the capacity to erode public trust and undermine democratic quality. In an information environment increasingly mediated by artificial intelligence, it is essential to understand how the media articulates disinformation discursively. This study analyses, using a mixed design of quantitative and qualitative content analysis, 178 articles published in the five main Spanish digital newspapers (El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, El Español and Eldiario.es), comparing the treatment of two cases of alleged political corruption. The results show significant differences in volume, journalistic genre, tone, framing, and use of disinformation terminology, confirming that the media do not act as neutral transmitters but rather as discursive actors that use disinformation lexicon for the purposes of attack, defence, or ideological legitimisation. There is also a predominance of emotional tones and rhetorical strategies that favour polarisation.

Social SciencesVol. 15(2)
Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategic Use of Disinformation Terminology in Political Communication: Media Narratives of Delegitimisation — Francisco Marcos Martín-Martín, Nereida Cea, et al. · Social Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS