Clinical Audit of Enteric Fever Diagnostic Practices at Kosti Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Evaluation

Background and objective Enteric fever remains a major public health problem in Sudan, particularly in areas with poor sanitation and limited health care resources. Accurate diagnosis is essential for appropriate management; however, diagnostic practices often rely on unreliable methods. This clinical audit aimed to evaluate current diagnostic practices for enteric fever at Kosti Teaching Hospital, assess adherence to WHO standards, identify gaps in diagnostic methods, and propose recommendations to improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods This study was a retrospective clinical audit conducted at Kosti Teaching Hospital, Sudan, reviewing the medical records of patients diagnosed with enteric (typhoid) fever during the study period. Data were extracted using a structured audit checklist to evaluate diagnostic practices, including documentation of clinical features, laboratory investigations requested (e.g., Widal/Felix-Widal test, serology, antibody testing, blood culture, and stool or rectal swab culture), and adherence to recommended diagnostic guidelines. Descriptive analysis was performed, and results were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Results Fifty-six patient records were reviewed. Headache and body pain (87.5%) and fever (85.7%) were the most common presenting symptoms. The Widal test was the most frequently used diagnostic tool (67.9%), followed by antibody detection (22.6%) and serology (Widal test) (17%). Blood culture, the diagnostic gold standard, was performed in only 1.9% of cases. No patients underwent stool culture or typhoid testing. The heavy reliance on the Widal test and clinical features, with minimal use of confirmatory tests, indicates substantial deviation from international guidelines. Conclusions The audit revealed significant gaps in enteric fever diagnosis at Kosti Teaching Hospital, characterized by heavy reliance on clinical assessment and Widal testing, with minimal use of blood culture due to limited resources. These practices compromise diagnostic accuracy and reflect broader health system challenges, including inadequate laboratory capacity and underfunding. Strengthening diagnostic infrastructure, improving access to reliable tests, and providing ongoing health care worker training are essential to align practices with WHO standards and improve patient outcomes in Sudan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102301
Primary Topic
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Audit of Enteric Fever Diagnostic Practices at Kosti Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Evaluation

Mustafa Sabir Abakar Awad, Esra Ebrahim Abdalhakam Fadalalmoula, Marwa Mohammed Almustfa Ibrahim, Jamela Elsiddig Ali Elsiddig et al.
Cureus
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
article

Clinical Audit of Enteric Fever Diagnostic Practices at Kosti Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Evaluation

Mustafa Sabir Abakar Awad, Esra Ebrahim Abdalhakam Fadalalmoula, Marwa Mohammed Almustfa Ibrahim, Jamela Elsiddig Ali Elsiddig, Tarig Alhadi Madibbo Ahmed, Asmaa Abdallah Mohammad Saeed, Marwa Mohammed Alfadel Kalol, Mohammed Fatahalla Khalid Malik, Babiker Omer Babiker Ibrahim, Enas Mohammed Ahmed Didi, Amna Yousif Mohammed Yassin, Ahmed S Yoseif, Ziryab Imad
article en

Abstract

Background and objective Enteric fever remains a major public health problem in Sudan, particularly in areas with poor sanitation and limited health care resources. Accurate diagnosis is essential for appropriate management; however, diagnostic practices often rely on unreliable methods. This clinical audit aimed to evaluate current diagnostic practices for enteric fever at Kosti Teaching Hospital, assess adherence to WHO standards, identify gaps in diagnostic methods, and propose recommendations to improve diagnostic accuracy. Methods This study was a retrospective clinical audit conducted at Kosti Teaching Hospital, Sudan, reviewing the medical records of patients diagnosed with enteric (typhoid) fever during the study period. Data were extracted using a structured audit checklist to evaluate diagnostic practices, including documentation of clinical features, laboratory investigations requested (e.g., Widal/Felix-Widal test, serology, antibody testing, blood culture, and stool or rectal swab culture), and adherence to recommended diagnostic guidelines. Descriptive analysis was performed, and results were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Results Fifty-six patient records were reviewed. Headache and body pain (87.5%) and fever (85.7%) were the most common presenting symptoms. The Widal test was the most frequently used diagnostic tool (67.9%), followed by antibody detection (22.6%) and serology (Widal test) (17%). Blood culture, the diagnostic gold standard, was performed in only 1.9% of cases. No patients underwent stool culture or typhoid testing. The heavy reliance on the Widal test and clinical features, with minimal use of confirmatory tests, indicates substantial deviation from international guidelines. Conclusions The audit revealed significant gaps in enteric fever diagnosis at Kosti Teaching Hospital, characterized by heavy reliance on clinical assessment and Widal testing, with minimal use of blood culture due to limited resources. These practices compromise diagnostic accuracy and reflect broader health system challenges, including inadequate laboratory capacity and underfunding. Strengthening diagnostic infrastructure, improving access to reliable tests, and providing ongoing health care worker training are essential to align practices with WHO standards and improve patient outcomes in Sudan.

CureusVol. 18(1)
Omdurman Ahlia University (SD), University of Science and Technology Omdurman (SD), Ebara Hospital (JP), University of El Imam El Mahdi (SD), Seva Mandir (IN), Sapporo Kosei General Hospital (JP), Sudan Medical Specialization Board (SD), University of Bahri (SD), Saft (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.