The American college of radiology diagnostic fluoroscopy dose index registry pilot: Dosimetric performance and benchmarking challenges
Fluoroscopic dose indices were accurate and stable over time. Differences in RDSR availability result in data biased to newer systems with flat panel detectors. Discrepancies in RDSR content and inconsistent reference point definitions necessitate use of P<sub>KA</sub> as the primary benchmark metric.
Authors
- Emily L. Marshall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7995-0671)
- Grant Fong
- Vivek Singh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3958-5635)
- Celalettin Topbaş (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2406-1070)
- Thomas K. Nishino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-822X)
- Liqiang Ren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-5166)
- Allen R. Goode (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9475-6671)
- Donald L. Miller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4599-5086)
- Alan H. Schoenfeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-5979)
- Steve D. Mann
- Pavlina Boxx
- Jie Zhang
Institutions
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
- Huntsville Hospital (US)
- Montefiore Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Duke University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Virginia Medical Center (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
- Published
- 2026-01-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70458
- Primary Topic
- Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00