Political Risk, Bargaining Power, and the Target Selection of Cross-Border Acquisitions

This study employs the firm-level political risk index by Hassan et al. (Q J Econ 134:2135–2202, 2019) to analyze political risk and the target selection decisions in cross-border acquisitions. We draw on bargaining power theory to illustrate the incentives for acquirers to undertake cross-border acquisitions amid political risk. A sample of 1106 international acquisitions by US-listed firms is collected to test the bargaining power hypothesis in international acquisitions. We find that acquirers with higher political risk tend to acquire targets with higher political risk and pay lower premiums. Moreover, the evidence suggests that the positive relationship between the political risk of acquirers and targets is stronger when acquirers and targets operate in related industries and culturally similar countries. The findings are robust to endogenous biases, subsample tests, and an alternative measure of political risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management International Review
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-025-00608-1
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Risk, Bargaining Power, and the Target Selection of Cross-Border Acquisitions

Shao-Chi Chang, Tien-Ho Cheng
Management International Review
International Business and FDI
article

Political Risk, Bargaining Power, and the Target Selection of Cross-Border Acquisitions

Shao-Chi Chang, Tien-Ho Cheng
article en

Abstract

This study employs the firm-level political risk index by Hassan et al. (Q J Econ 134:2135–2202, 2019) to analyze political risk and the target selection decisions in cross-border acquisitions. We draw on bargaining power theory to illustrate the incentives for acquirers to undertake cross-border acquisitions amid political risk. A sample of 1106 international acquisitions by US-listed firms is collected to test the bargaining power hypothesis in international acquisitions. We find that acquirers with higher political risk tend to acquire targets with higher political risk and pay lower premiums. Moreover, the evidence suggests that the positive relationship between the political risk of acquirers and targets is stronger when acquirers and targets operate in related industries and culturally similar countries. The findings are robust to endogenous biases, subsample tests, and an alternative measure of political risk.

Management International Review
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
National Cheng Kung University, National Science and Technology Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.