Determining representative length in analytical model for artificial ground freezing: A numerical study
Parameter ambiguity, particularly the representative length l denoting the overall scale of the frozen wall, frequently impedes the development of analytical models for artificial ground freezing. This study proposes a quantitative methodology for determining l using numerical simulations. After validating the coupled thermo-hydraulic solver against laboratory experiments, we conducted a parametric study of 12 pipe layouts under varying groundwater velocities. The results showed that the critical flow velocity decreased with the number of pipes owing to the hydraulic dam-up effect. Subsequently, a multiple linear regression model was used to predict l as a function of the total wall length, pipe density, and their interactions. This analysis revealed that a higher pipe density significantly improved the hydraulic robustness of longer frozen walls. The predictive model achieved a high coefficient of determination of 0.9771. By transforming l from a vague assumption into a predictable parameter for high-permeability soils, this study bridges numerical simulations and analytical models to enhance engineering design reliability. • A predictive model for the representative length ( l ) in AGF is proposed. • l is transformed from a vague assumption into a predictable design parameter. • A novel data analysis using hyperbolic fitting determines critical velocity. • Regression model predicts l from geometry with high accuracy ( R 2 = 0.977 ).
Authors
- Hirotaka Saito (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-008X)
- Masato Oishi
- Kunio Watanabe
- Shun Kikuchi
- Yusuke Yabuuchi
Institutions
- Mie University (JP)
- Seiko Holdings (Japan) (JP)
- Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cold Regions Science and Technology
- Published
- 2026-01-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2026.104842
- Primary Topic
- Climate change and permafrost
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00