Six-Year Environmental Surface Hygiene Monitoring in Hungarian School Kitchens (2019–2024): Hotspots, Seasonality, and One Health Implications

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Institutional catering serves vulnerable populations, including schoolchildren. Surfaces in food preparation environments are key control points for food safety and reservoirs and transmission routes for antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. This study characterized the hygienic status of food-contact surfaces (FCS) and non-food-contact surfaces (NFCS) in Hungarian school kitchens, identified contamination hotspots, and examined how routine monitoring can support AMR prevention. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed routine environmental hygiene monitoring records from 96 school kitchens (2019-2024). In total, 8412 swab samples were collected, 8407 had quantifiable counts, 6233 from FCS (e.g., plates, trays, boards, utensils), and 2174 from NFCS (e.g., sinks, fridges, workers' hands). Total aerobic mesophilic counts were measured with a redox-potential method and expressed as CFU/100 cm<sup>2</sup>; 250 CFU/100 cm<sup>2</sup> (2.4 log<sub>10</sub>) was the hygienic threshold. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 12.4% of surfaces exceeded the threshold. Non-food-contact surfaces were more likely to be non-compliant than food-contact surfaces (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.43-3.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hotspots included transport-container lids (67.2% non-compliant; OR 43.82), sink basins (32.8%; OR 10.46), and cutting boards (21.6%; OR 5.89). Seasonally, non-compliance was highest in summer (16.5%) and lowest in winter (9.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Multi-year monitoring revealed substantial contamination concentrated in a few hotspots that, within a One Health framework-which recognizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health-may represent environmental reservoirs and cross-contamination nodes relevant to AMR prevention. Targeted optimization of cleaning and disinfection for these surfaces, combined with trend analysis of indicator data and periodic AMR-focused environmental sampling, could reduce foodborne and AMR-related risks in public catering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15020120
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Six-Year Environmental Surface Hygiene Monitoring in Hungarian School Kitchens (2019–2024): Hotspots, Seasonality, and One Health Implications

Márton Battay, Miklós Süth, András Bittsánszky, Lili A. Lukács et al.
Antibiotics
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Six-Year Environmental Surface Hygiene Monitoring in Hungarian School Kitchens (2019–2024): Hotspots, Seasonality, and One Health Implications

Márton Battay, Miklós Süth, András Bittsánszky, Lili A. Lukács, András J. Tóth
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Institutional catering serves vulnerable populations, including schoolchildren. Surfaces in food preparation environments are key control points for food safety and reservoirs and transmission routes for antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. This study characterized the hygienic status of food-contact surfaces (FCS) and non-food-contact surfaces (NFCS) in Hungarian school kitchens, identified contamination hotspots, and examined how routine monitoring can support AMR prevention. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed routine environmental hygiene monitoring records from 96 school kitchens (2019-2024). In total, 8412 swab samples were collected, 8407 had quantifiable counts, 6233 from FCS (e.g., plates, trays, boards, utensils), and 2174 from NFCS (e.g., sinks, fridges, workers' hands). Total aerobic mesophilic counts were measured with a redox-potential method and expressed as CFU/100 cm<sup>2</sup>; 250 CFU/100 cm<sup>2</sup> (2.4 log<sub>10</sub>) was the hygienic threshold. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 12.4% of surfaces exceeded the threshold. Non-food-contact surfaces were more likely to be non-compliant than food-contact surfaces (OR 2.77, 95% CI 2.43-3.17; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hotspots included transport-container lids (67.2% non-compliant; OR 43.82), sink basins (32.8%; OR 10.46), and cutting boards (21.6%; OR 5.89). Seasonally, non-compliance was highest in summer (16.5%) and lowest in winter (9.0%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Multi-year monitoring revealed substantial contamination concentrated in a few hotspots that, within a One Health framework-which recognizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health-may represent environmental reservoirs and cross-contamination nodes relevant to AMR prevention. Targeted optimization of cleaning and disinfection for these surfaces, combined with trend analysis of indicator data and periodic AMR-focused environmental sampling, could reduce foodborne and AMR-related risks in public catering.

AntibioticsVol. 15(2)
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU), National Food Chain Safety Office (HU), National Institute for Food and Nutrition Science (HU), University of Veterinary Medicine (HU)
Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.