THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AND THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA (2010 -2023)

Research Problem This paper examines how the African Development Bank (AfDB) has contributed to Nigeria’s energy sector between 2010 and 2023, focusing on governance effectiveness, equity in energy access, and alignment with SDG 7 and the African Union’s Agenda 2063. AfDB interventions through technical assistance, and financing have expanded access but criticised for gas bias, procedural shortcomings, and uneven distributive outcomes. Methods/Theory Using a qualitative case study design, the research applies Energy Justice Theory (distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions) and Liberal Institutionalism (institutional coordination and mutual gains). Data sources included documentary analysis of AfDB projects and national policies, Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of causal configurations, and stakeholder interviews (one regulator and four Jigawa Solar IPP beneficiaries). Results Findings show modest gains in distributive justice through rural electrification and off-grid renewables, exemplified by the Nigeria Electrification Project (2 million connections) and the Jigawa Solar IPP (50,000 households). However, procedural and recognition justice remain weak due to limited community engagement and elite‑driven decision‑making. Conclusion All in all, AfDB has become more accessible and institutionally stable but its developmental performance is limited by gaps in inclusivity, which lead to incomplete SDG 7 and Agenda 2063 adherence. Contribution to Knowledge This study pioneers the use of fsQCA in evaluating AfDB energy interventions in Nigeria and recommends participatory governance via community quotas, local institutional capacity building through knowledge transfer, and redistribution of funding toward community‑based renewables to achieve sustainable and inclusive energy models. Recommendation It recommends participatory governance via community quotas, local institutional capacity building through knowledge transfer, and redistribution of funding toward community‑based renewables to achieve sustainable and inclusive energy models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wukari International Studies Journal
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64633/wissj.v9i8.21
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AND THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA (2010 -2023)

OGBECHE JANET FIDELIS, SALEH DAUDA, IDIONGOMFON CLEMENT OKON
Wukari International Studies Journal
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AND THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA (2010 -2023)

OGBECHE JANET FIDELIS, SALEH DAUDA, IDIONGOMFON CLEMENT OKON
article en

Abstract

Research Problem This paper examines how the African Development Bank (AfDB) has contributed to Nigeria’s energy sector between 2010 and 2023, focusing on governance effectiveness, equity in energy access, and alignment with SDG 7 and the African Union’s Agenda 2063. AfDB interventions through technical assistance, and financing have expanded access but criticised for gas bias, procedural shortcomings, and uneven distributive outcomes. Methods/Theory Using a qualitative case study design, the research applies Energy Justice Theory (distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions) and Liberal Institutionalism (institutional coordination and mutual gains). Data sources included documentary analysis of AfDB projects and national policies, Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of causal configurations, and stakeholder interviews (one regulator and four Jigawa Solar IPP beneficiaries). Results Findings show modest gains in distributive justice through rural electrification and off-grid renewables, exemplified by the Nigeria Electrification Project (2 million connections) and the Jigawa Solar IPP (50,000 households). However, procedural and recognition justice remain weak due to limited community engagement and elite‑driven decision‑making. Conclusion All in all, AfDB has become more accessible and institutionally stable but its developmental performance is limited by gaps in inclusivity, which lead to incomplete SDG 7 and Agenda 2063 adherence. Contribution to Knowledge This study pioneers the use of fsQCA in evaluating AfDB energy interventions in Nigeria and recommends participatory governance via community quotas, local institutional capacity building through knowledge transfer, and redistribution of funding toward community‑based renewables to achieve sustainable and inclusive energy models. Recommendation It recommends participatory governance via community quotas, local institutional capacity building through knowledge transfer, and redistribution of funding toward community‑based renewables to achieve sustainable and inclusive energy models.

Wukari International Studies JournalVol. 9(8)
University of Abuja (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK AND THE ENERGY SECTOR IN NIGERIA (2010 -2023) — OGBECHE JANET FIDELIS, SALEH DAUDA, et al. · Wukari International Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS