Four poems: ‘Waves’, ‘after Thinking Like a Mountain’, ‘Fire’, ‘Water’

In the Anthropocene era, human activity on the planet – including deforestation, agriculture, extraction, industrial production and consumption – has dominated earth’s biosphere so drastically as to create global, ecological imbalances. The practice of ecopoetics stands in contrast to an anthropocentric approach of place-domination. Instead, ecopoetic place-making explores connection and responsibility to earth. In Australia, this is a difficult task, since many of us are living on stolen land that is also “wounded space … that has been torn and fractured by violence and exile” (Rose p. 2). In the ecopoetic vein, these poems seek to witness: to listen with attentiveness to the destruction of ecological and cultural systems, as well as to the life that endures through trees, rivers, soil, plant life, culture, animals and people – all beings. Responsive to the processes of nature, the poems begin to imitate. Within this framework of relationality, poetry becomes an act of care. As John Seed and Arne Naess posit, conscious identification with other life-forms leads to coexistence and care (Seed et al. p. 13, p. 25). Through voice and connection, writing engenders receptive healing, both personal and in the historical present, and into death. The poetry imagines a diverse reality: one in which the land is returned to its rightful caretakers and all beings retain the chance to flourish.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TEXT
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.155459
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four poems: ‘Waves’, ‘after Thinking Like a Mountain’, ‘Fire’, ‘Water’

Lucia Moon
TEXT
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Four poems: ‘Waves’, ‘after Thinking Like a Mountain’, ‘Fire’, ‘Water’

Lucia Moon
article en

Abstract

In the Anthropocene era, human activity on the planet – including deforestation, agriculture, extraction, industrial production and consumption – has dominated earth’s biosphere so drastically as to create global, ecological imbalances. The practice of ecopoetics stands in contrast to an anthropocentric approach of place-domination. Instead, ecopoetic place-making explores connection and responsibility to earth. In Australia, this is a difficult task, since many of us are living on stolen land that is also “wounded space … that has been torn and fractured by violence and exile” (Rose p. 2). In the ecopoetic vein, these poems seek to witness: to listen with attentiveness to the destruction of ecological and cultural systems, as well as to the life that endures through trees, rivers, soil, plant life, culture, animals and people – all beings. Responsive to the processes of nature, the poems begin to imitate. Within this framework of relationality, poetry becomes an act of care. As John Seed and Arne Naess posit, conscious identification with other life-forms leads to coexistence and care (Seed et al. p. 13, p. 25). Through voice and connection, writing engenders receptive healing, both personal and in the historical present, and into death. The poetry imagines a diverse reality: one in which the land is returned to its rightful caretakers and all beings retain the chance to flourish.

TEXTVol. 30(Special 76)
Film Independent (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.