Society-centric corporate social responsibility through reflexivity: four reflexive research strategies

Reflexivity helps address descriptive and normative issues arising from the society-centric CSR debate about the role a company plays and should play in addressing the world’s most pressing societal grand challenges. However, CSR exhibits a reflexivity deficit, undermining society centrism in CSR. So, we ask: How do we systematically apply reflexivity in favor of society-centric CSR? We conduct a theoretically-informed review of the CSR literature, employing reflexivity in management scholarship to address the reflexivity deficit in CSR. Rather than capturing gaps in the literature and seeking to fill them, a theoretically-informed review introduces specific theoretical perspectives (in our case, reflexive management scholarship) into the theory and practice of the field (such as CSR), aiming to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. Based on our theoretically-informed analysis of the literature, we introduce four reflexive CSR research strategies that guide the systematic application of reflexivity in favor of society-centric CSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Business
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-025-00129-y
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Society-centric corporate social responsibility through reflexivity: four reflexive research strategies

David Risi
Journal of Sustainable Business
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Society-centric corporate social responsibility through reflexivity: four reflexive research strategies

David Risi
article en

Abstract

Reflexivity helps address descriptive and normative issues arising from the society-centric CSR debate about the role a company plays and should play in addressing the world’s most pressing societal grand challenges. However, CSR exhibits a reflexivity deficit, undermining society centrism in CSR. So, we ask: How do we systematically apply reflexivity in favor of society-centric CSR? We conduct a theoretically-informed review of the CSR literature, employing reflexivity in management scholarship to address the reflexivity deficit in CSR. Rather than capturing gaps in the literature and seeking to fill them, a theoretically-informed review introduces specific theoretical perspectives (in our case, reflexive management scholarship) into the theory and practice of the field (such as CSR), aiming to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. Based on our theoretically-informed analysis of the literature, we introduce four reflexive CSR research strategies that guide the systematic application of reflexivity in favor of society-centric CSR.

Journal of Sustainable BusinessVol. 11(1)
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of St.Gallen (CH), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Society-centric corporate social responsibility through reflexivity: four reflexive research strategies — David Risi · Journal of Sustainable Business (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS