Notes on Russia's Official Discourse on International Cooperation in the Arctic

This policy brief analyzes Russia’s official discourse on international cooperation in the Arctic during the second half of 2025 and January 2026, based on public statements by federal authorities, diplomatic institutions, and sector-specific bodies. The analysis highlights a shift from declarative “openness” toward a more selective and functionally bounded approach, in which international cooperation is framed as acceptable mainly in concrete, practice-oriented formats such as infrastructure, transport, science, and environmental management. Within this discourse, a clear distinction is drawn between the United States, viewed as a potential partner for limited and selective engagement, and European allies, which are predominantly discussed in the context of sanctions, NATO expansion, and the militarization of the Arctic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18368154
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Notes on Russia's Official Discourse on International Cooperation in the Arctic

Sergei Gladkov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Notes on Russia's Official Discourse on International Cooperation in the Arctic

Sergei Gladkov
article en

Abstract

This policy brief analyzes Russia’s official discourse on international cooperation in the Arctic during the second half of 2025 and January 2026, based on public statements by federal authorities, diplomatic institutions, and sector-specific bodies. The analysis highlights a shift from declarative “openness” toward a more selective and functionally bounded approach, in which international cooperation is framed as acceptable mainly in concrete, practice-oriented formats such as infrastructure, transport, science, and environmental management. Within this discourse, a clear distinction is drawn between the United States, viewed as a potential partner for limited and selective engagement, and European allies, which are predominantly discussed in the context of sanctions, NATO expansion, and the militarization of the Arctic.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oldham Council (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.