Bioethics in assisted reproduction and embryology

The use of assisted reproductive therapies, advances in embryo research, and developments in scientific fields such as gene editing and <i>in vitro</i> gametogenesis have attracted the attention of bioethicists for years. On one side, the 14-day rule has faced criticism from embryo researchers advocating for its extension. On the other side, the increasing number of cryopreserved embryos worldwide has raised practical and ethical concerns about their fate. While advancements in scientific research, especially gene editing and in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), are not yet fully applicable, their potential future use appears to pose significant bioethical questions. In this review, we examine the evolving bioethics of embryo research, focusing on the 14-day rule, the challenges surrounding surplus cryopreserved embryos, and the future dilemmas posed by CRISPR-based gene editing, IVG, and preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk (PGT-P). We also highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary, patient-centered counseling in ART practice, to foster informed consent, realistic expectations, and psychosocial well-being. Finally, we underscore the need for anticipatory ethical frameworks and open-society engagement that integrate public deliberation with scientific progress to ensure that reproductive innovation proceeds responsibly, preserving both human dignity and social justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2026.2618252
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioethics in assisted reproduction and embryology

Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Georgia Kokkali, Peter Šutovský, Dimitrios Ioannou et al.
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Bioethics in assisted reproduction and embryology

Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Georgia Kokkali, Peter Šutovský, Dimitrios Ioannou, George Anifandis, Christina I. Messini, Helen G. Tempest, Eleni Zagelidou
article en

Abstract

The use of assisted reproductive therapies, advances in embryo research, and developments in scientific fields such as gene editing and <i>in vitro</i> gametogenesis have attracted the attention of bioethicists for years. On one side, the 14-day rule has faced criticism from embryo researchers advocating for its extension. On the other side, the increasing number of cryopreserved embryos worldwide has raised practical and ethical concerns about their fate. While advancements in scientific research, especially gene editing and in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), are not yet fully applicable, their potential future use appears to pose significant bioethical questions. In this review, we examine the evolving bioethics of embryo research, focusing on the 14-day rule, the challenges surrounding surplus cryopreserved embryos, and the future dilemmas posed by CRISPR-based gene editing, IVG, and preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk (PGT-P). We also highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary, patient-centered counseling in ART practice, to foster informed consent, realistic expectations, and psychosocial well-being. Finally, we underscore the need for anticipatory ethical frameworks and open-society engagement that integrate public deliberation with scientific progress to ensure that reproductive innovation proceeds responsibly, preserving both human dignity and social justice.

Systems Biology in Reproductive MedicineVol. 72(1)
University of Thessaly (GR), Roseman University of Health Sciences (US), University of Missouri Health System (US), Papageorgiou General Hospital (GR), Department of Embryology (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.