Exploring antibiotic stewardship interventions within a One Health context: a scoping review

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) presents a global threat to human health, animal health, and the environment. While ABR is a natural phenomenon, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human health, animal health, and food production is a major driver of ABR. As interactions between humans, animals, and the environment are central to the emergence and spread of ABR, adopting a One Health approach is essential to effectively address the issue. In this context, a large range of antibiotic stewardship interventions has been developed to optimize the use of antibiotics. However, we lack a comprehensive overview of the landscape of antibiotic stewardship interventions from a One Health perspective. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of existing policy interventions. The literature review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We systematically searched three major databases to retrieve interventions meeting our inclusion criteria. We purposively sampled some of these interventions to illustrate the diversity of existing interventions. These sampled interventions were then assessed according to 26 variables related to their general characteristics, development and implementation mode, scope, One Health and equity dimensions, and impacts. We conducted a descriptive analysis on the data extracted to summarize the characteristics of the antibiotic stewardship interventions. The 29 selected interventions focus on communication with stakeholders and the general public, access to antibiotics and their usage, and antibiotic disposal. Regarding their One Health aspects, the interventions varied in terms of collaboration across sectors and levels, engagement with the private sector, and equity considerations. Strong livestock industry engagement, efficient legal and institutional frameworks and provision of alternatives to antibiotics acted as facilitators to intervention implementation and success. Interventions demonstrated effects in terms of changes in antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, awareness, and practices, as well as impacts on animal health and productivity. This study highlights the persistent dominance of human health objectives in the design and implementation of One Health antibiotic stewardship interventions and the continuous need to strengthen evaluation of such interventions to better understand facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as intervention impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1707695
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring antibiotic stewardship interventions within a One Health context: a scoping review

Mary E. Wiktorowicz, Sandrina Vandenput, Tarra L. Penney, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Exploring antibiotic stewardship interventions within a One Health context: a scoping review

Mary E. Wiktorowicz, Sandrina Vandenput, Tarra L. Penney, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa, Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow, Marion Bordier, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Léo Delpy, Ria Benko, Arne Ruckert, Chloe Clifford Astbury, A. M. Viens
article en

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) presents a global threat to human health, animal health, and the environment. While ABR is a natural phenomenon, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human health, animal health, and food production is a major driver of ABR. As interactions between humans, animals, and the environment are central to the emergence and spread of ABR, adopting a One Health approach is essential to effectively address the issue. In this context, a large range of antibiotic stewardship interventions has been developed to optimize the use of antibiotics. However, we lack a comprehensive overview of the landscape of antibiotic stewardship interventions from a One Health perspective. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of existing policy interventions. The literature review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We systematically searched three major databases to retrieve interventions meeting our inclusion criteria. We purposively sampled some of these interventions to illustrate the diversity of existing interventions. These sampled interventions were then assessed according to 26 variables related to their general characteristics, development and implementation mode, scope, One Health and equity dimensions, and impacts. We conducted a descriptive analysis on the data extracted to summarize the characteristics of the antibiotic stewardship interventions. The 29 selected interventions focus on communication with stakeholders and the general public, access to antibiotics and their usage, and antibiotic disposal. Regarding their One Health aspects, the interventions varied in terms of collaboration across sectors and levels, engagement with the private sector, and equity considerations. Strong livestock industry engagement, efficient legal and institutional frameworks and provision of alternatives to antibiotics acted as facilitators to intervention implementation and success. Interventions demonstrated effects in terms of changes in antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, awareness, and practices, as well as impacts on animal health and productivity. This study highlights the persistent dominance of human health objectives in the design and implementation of One Health antibiotic stewardship interventions and the continuous need to strengthen evaluation of such interventions to better understand facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as intervention impacts.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Université Gaston Berger (SN), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), University of Liège (BE), York University (CA), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Szeged (HU), Global Strategy Group (US), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Animal, Santé, Territoires, Risques et Ecosystèmes (FR), Centre Lillois d'Etudes et de Recherches Sociologiques et Economiques (FR), Centre for Global Health Research (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), National Veterinary Research Institute (NG), Université de Montréal (CA), Catholic University of America (US)
Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.