Performance of Five Satellite‐Based Precipitation Products in Capturing Extreme Precipitation and Streamflow Over 280 Catchments Across Mainland China

ABSTRACT Satellite‐based precipitation estimates (SPEs) play a crucial role in characterising extreme precipitation and streamflow, which are essential for flood risk management and water resource planning. However, substantial discrepancies remain among existing SPE products. This study systematically evaluates the performance of five widely used SPEs, including CHIRPS V2, CMORPH BLD, PERSIANN CDR, TMPA 3B42v7, and MSWEP V2, in capturing extreme precipitation and streamflow across 280 catchments in mainland China during 1998–2020. Six extreme precipitation indices (RX1day, RX5day, R95p, R20mm, CWD, and CDD) and three extreme streamflow indices (Qx1d, Qx3d, Qx5d) were analysed using CC, RMSE, and PBIAS. Streamflow was simulated using the lumped Xinanjiang (XAJ) hydrological model and evaluated against observations through NSE and PBIAS. Results show that MSWEP V2 and CMORPH BLD, which incorporate daily gauge‐based corrections, consistently outperform the other three products in reproducing daily and extreme precipitation. When used to drive the XAJ model, these two products yield streamflow simulations comparable to those driven by gauge‐based precipitation, demonstrating their suitability for hydrological applications. Spatially, both precipitation estimation and streamflow simulation achieve higher accuracy in humid and semi‐humid regions with dense gauge networks, whereas performance deteriorates in arid and mountainous regions characterised by sparse observations and complex topography. All SPEs tend to underestimate extreme streamflow magnitudes. Nevertheless, precipitation errors are partly attenuated during the rainfall–runoff transformation, leading to improved hydrological consistency. Overall, this study highlights the robustness of MSWEP V2 and CMORPH BLD for hydrological modelling and underscores the need to further refine satellite retrieval algorithms to enhance performance in topographically complex and data‐scarce regions. The findings provide practical guidance for the selection and application of SPEs in extreme precipitation analysis and hydrological applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70273
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Five Satellite‐Based Precipitation Products in Capturing Extreme Precipitation and Streamflow Over 280 Catchments Across Mainland China

Tao Peng, Jinfang Yin, Haixia Qi, Yue Zhou et al.
International Journal of Climatology
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Performance of Five Satellite‐Based Precipitation Products in Capturing Extreme Precipitation and Streamflow Over 280 Catchments Across Mainland China

Tao Peng, Jinfang Yin, Haixia Qi, Yue Zhou, Jin Ren, Zhiyuan Yin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Satellite‐based precipitation estimates (SPEs) play a crucial role in characterising extreme precipitation and streamflow, which are essential for flood risk management and water resource planning. However, substantial discrepancies remain among existing SPE products. This study systematically evaluates the performance of five widely used SPEs, including CHIRPS V2, CMORPH BLD, PERSIANN CDR, TMPA 3B42v7, and MSWEP V2, in capturing extreme precipitation and streamflow across 280 catchments in mainland China during 1998–2020. Six extreme precipitation indices (RX1day, RX5day, R95p, R20mm, CWD, and CDD) and three extreme streamflow indices (Qx1d, Qx3d, Qx5d) were analysed using CC, RMSE, and PBIAS. Streamflow was simulated using the lumped Xinanjiang (XAJ) hydrological model and evaluated against observations through NSE and PBIAS. Results show that MSWEP V2 and CMORPH BLD, which incorporate daily gauge‐based corrections, consistently outperform the other three products in reproducing daily and extreme precipitation. When used to drive the XAJ model, these two products yield streamflow simulations comparable to those driven by gauge‐based precipitation, demonstrating their suitability for hydrological applications. Spatially, both precipitation estimation and streamflow simulation achieve higher accuracy in humid and semi‐humid regions with dense gauge networks, whereas performance deteriorates in arid and mountainous regions characterised by sparse observations and complex topography. All SPEs tend to underestimate extreme streamflow magnitudes. Nevertheless, precipitation errors are partly attenuated during the rainfall–runoff transformation, leading to improved hydrological consistency. Overall, this study highlights the robustness of MSWEP V2 and CMORPH BLD for hydrological modelling and underscores the need to further refine satellite retrieval algorithms to enhance performance in topographically complex and data‐scarce regions. The findings provide practical guidance for the selection and application of SPEs in extreme precipitation analysis and hydrological applications.

International Journal of Climatology
China Meteorological Administration (CN), China Three Gorges University (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.