Cuerpo-Territorio. Lessons Learnt on a Method to Study Embodied Emotions

Qualitative researchers have strived to recenter epistemic authority and knowledge creation by increasingly engaging with Indigenous methodologies. Such effort is fundamental to decolonizing research i.e., putting the research participant in the position of the knower and facilitating the emergence of their knowledge through methods aligned with their ontoepistemology. In this paper, we introduce the method of cuerpo-territorio (body-territory) to the wider social science Anglophone qualitative research milieu and join the conversation regarding the centrality of emotions in research. Cuerpo-territorio is a method for qualitative research centered on emotional and embodied responses to environmental change, developed by Latin American communitarian feminists and collectives. It is grounded in the ontological understanding that what happens to the environment is reflected and experienced in one’s body. In this article, we draw on original material from two case studies in Oña and Nabón, Ecuador and Xolobeni, South Africa, where local communities are involved in resisting the threat of impending mining projects. We reflect on the lessons we have learnt through applying cuerpo-territorio, particularly in relation to participants’ time availability and discomfort in drawing and linking the body and the territory to strengthen the method and enhance its broader application. We learnt that we cannot assume that participants will be fully able to appreciate its value and lend their time to it. In ideal circumstances, having time to properly deploy the method, leaving space for plenty of participants’ reflections, avoids instrumentalizing the method as purely a data-gathering tool and opens the possibility of rupturing it and making it their own for participants and researchers alike. Realizing when these circumstances are not present and adjusting the course of our projects is a fundamental part of our work of reflexivity as scholars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261418386
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cuerpo-Territorio. Lessons Learnt on a Method to Study Embodied Emotions

Vasna Ramasar, Martina Angela Caretta, Sofía Zaragocín, Kamila Torres
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Cuerpo-Territorio. Lessons Learnt on a Method to Study Embodied Emotions

Vasna Ramasar, Martina Angela Caretta, Sofía Zaragocín, Kamila Torres
article en

Abstract

Qualitative researchers have strived to recenter epistemic authority and knowledge creation by increasingly engaging with Indigenous methodologies. Such effort is fundamental to decolonizing research i.e., putting the research participant in the position of the knower and facilitating the emergence of their knowledge through methods aligned with their ontoepistemology. In this paper, we introduce the method of cuerpo-territorio (body-territory) to the wider social science Anglophone qualitative research milieu and join the conversation regarding the centrality of emotions in research. Cuerpo-territorio is a method for qualitative research centered on emotional and embodied responses to environmental change, developed by Latin American communitarian feminists and collectives. It is grounded in the ontological understanding that what happens to the environment is reflected and experienced in one’s body. In this article, we draw on original material from two case studies in Oña and Nabón, Ecuador and Xolobeni, South Africa, where local communities are involved in resisting the threat of impending mining projects. We reflect on the lessons we have learnt through applying cuerpo-territorio, particularly in relation to participants’ time availability and discomfort in drawing and linking the body and the territory to strengthen the method and enhance its broader application. We learnt that we cannot assume that participants will be fully able to appreciate its value and lend their time to it. In ideal circumstances, having time to properly deploy the method, leaving space for plenty of participants’ reflections, avoids instrumentalizing the method as purely a data-gathering tool and opens the possibility of rupturing it and making it their own for participants and researchers alike. Realizing when these circumstances are not present and adjusting the course of our projects is a fundamental part of our work of reflexivity as scholars.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
Lund University (SE), University of Illinois System (US), Universidad del Azuay (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.