Themes of Good vs. Evil in Amish Tripathi's Shiva Trilogy

Myth is a traditional narrative rooted in the ancient past of a culture, often used to explain social, moral, or environmental phenomena. Situated between anthropology, philosophy, and literature, myth simultaneously denotes belief, symbolism, and imaginative truth. Tradition, closely linked to myth, refers to belief systems and behavioural patterns transmitted across generations. Amish Tripathi’s Shiva Trilogy reimagines Indian mythology by presenting the theme of good versus evil not as a rigid binary but as a complex and evolving moral framework. Through the humanisation of Shiva and the reinterpretation of mythic institutions such as Meluha, the Chandravanshis, and the Somras, the trilogy questions absolute moral positions. Evil is not portrayed as an external force but as the outcome of flawed choices, rigid ideologies, and unintended consequences. This paper examines how Tripathi deconstructs the conventional understanding of good and evil, presenting them as relative and contextual rather than absolute. By analysing characters, societies, and ethical dilemmas within the trilogy, the study highlights how mythology is used as a tool to explore moral ambiguity and contemporary social concerns. The paper argues that the Shiva Trilogy presents good and evil as dynamic concepts shaped by perception, responsibility, and balance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18367998
Primary Topic
Indian History and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Themes of Good vs. Evil in Amish Tripathi's Shiva Trilogy

Nysha Divakar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian History and Philosophy
article

Themes of Good vs. Evil in Amish Tripathi's Shiva Trilogy

Nysha Divakar
article en

Abstract

Myth is a traditional narrative rooted in the ancient past of a culture, often used to explain social, moral, or environmental phenomena. Situated between anthropology, philosophy, and literature, myth simultaneously denotes belief, symbolism, and imaginative truth. Tradition, closely linked to myth, refers to belief systems and behavioural patterns transmitted across generations. Amish Tripathi’s Shiva Trilogy reimagines Indian mythology by presenting the theme of good versus evil not as a rigid binary but as a complex and evolving moral framework. Through the humanisation of Shiva and the reinterpretation of mythic institutions such as Meluha, the Chandravanshis, and the Somras, the trilogy questions absolute moral positions. Evil is not portrayed as an external force but as the outcome of flawed choices, rigid ideologies, and unintended consequences. This paper examines how Tripathi deconstructs the conventional understanding of good and evil, presenting them as relative and contextual rather than absolute. By analysing characters, societies, and ethical dilemmas within the trilogy, the study highlights how mythology is used as a tool to explore moral ambiguity and contemporary social concerns. The paper argues that the Shiva Trilogy presents good and evil as dynamic concepts shaped by perception, responsibility, and balance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Indian History and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Themes of Good vs. Evil in Amish Tripathi's Shiva Trilogy — Nysha Divakar · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS