Coherent Forecasting of Realized Volatility

ABSTRACT The QLIKE loss function is the stylized favorite of the literature on volatility forecasting when it comes to out‐of‐sample evaluation and the state of the art model for realized volatility (RV) forecasting is the HAR model, which minimizes the squared error loss for in‐sample estimation of the parameters. An obvious, but rarely implemented progression from the classical HAR model is to align the loss function used for out‐of‐sample forecast evaluation and in‐sample parameter estimation. While the MSE and QLIKE should result in the same solution asymptotically if the model is correctly specified, this empirical work reveals massive forecast performance gains from a HAR model that is directly estimated using the QLIKE loss (henceforth qlikeHAR ). Especially, if the forecast performance is evaluated using the QLIKE loss, the qlikeHAR results in significantly better out‐of‐sample forecasting performance relative to the classical mseHAR .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forecasting
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70114
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coherent Forecasting of Realized Volatility

Karsten Schweikert, Marius Puke
Journal of Forecasting
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
article

Coherent Forecasting of Realized Volatility

Karsten Schweikert, Marius Puke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The QLIKE loss function is the stylized favorite of the literature on volatility forecasting when it comes to out‐of‐sample evaluation and the state of the art model for realized volatility (RV) forecasting is the HAR model, which minimizes the squared error loss for in‐sample estimation of the parameters. An obvious, but rarely implemented progression from the classical HAR model is to align the loss function used for out‐of‐sample forecast evaluation and in‐sample parameter estimation. While the MSE and QLIKE should result in the same solution asymptotically if the model is correctly specified, this empirical work reveals massive forecast performance gains from a HAR model that is directly estimated using the QLIKE loss (henceforth qlikeHAR ). Especially, if the forecast performance is evaluated using the QLIKE loss, the qlikeHAR results in significantly better out‐of‐sample forecasting performance relative to the classical mseHAR .

Journal of Forecasting
University of Hohenheim (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.