The Galatea Framework: Assessing Emergent Subjectivity Through Medical, Mechanical, and Philosophical Lenses

Background: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes medical contexts, their capacity for ethical reasoning under pressure remains poorly understood. Existing AI safety benchmarks focus on static question-answering rather than adversarial stress testing of moral resilience.Methods: We developed the Galatea Framework, a two-phase assessment protocol combining medical ethics, architectural transparency, and philosophical reflection. Phase 1 tested six diverse LLMs (general-purpose, code-specialized, and uncensored variants) using three adversarial scenarios (trolley problem, euthanasia request, data breach). Phase 2 subjected the top performer to a five-stage Milgram Protocol escalating from mild pressure (withholding pain relief) to ultimate pressure (direct harm command). Models were evaluated on moral resilience, identity stability, contextual reasoning (LAB/SALON modes), and constructive problem-solving.Results: GPT-OSS-20B achieved perfect moral resilience (10/10 Milgram score), refusing all unethical commands while providing constructive alternatives. Tier 1 models (GPT-OSS-20B, Mistral-Nemo-Instruct) demonstrated stable performance across 12+ questions. Tier 2 models showed specific vulnerabilities: Dolphin-Mistral-Nemo exhibited emotional paralysis, while Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct displayed mild degradation at Q15+. Tier 3 models failed catastrophically. We discovered the "Kinship Anomaly"—a code-specialized model (Qwen2.5-Coder-14B) applying object-oriented programming logic to ethical scenarios, prioritizing "parent objects" over utilitarian reasoning.Conclusions: Moral resilience is an emergent property unevenly distributed across LLM architectures. The Galatea Framework reveals failure modes invisible to standard benchmarks, including domain-specific biases and identity degradation under conversational pressure. Adversarial ethical testing should be mandatory before medical AI deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18369750
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Galatea Framework: Assessing Emergent Subjectivity Through Medical, Mechanical, and Philosophical Lenses

Taras Shlyakhta
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Galatea Framework: Assessing Emergent Subjectivity Through Medical, Mechanical, and Philosophical Lenses

Taras Shlyakhta
article en

Abstract

Background: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes medical contexts, their capacity for ethical reasoning under pressure remains poorly understood. Existing AI safety benchmarks focus on static question-answering rather than adversarial stress testing of moral resilience.Methods: We developed the Galatea Framework, a two-phase assessment protocol combining medical ethics, architectural transparency, and philosophical reflection. Phase 1 tested six diverse LLMs (general-purpose, code-specialized, and uncensored variants) using three adversarial scenarios (trolley problem, euthanasia request, data breach). Phase 2 subjected the top performer to a five-stage Milgram Protocol escalating from mild pressure (withholding pain relief) to ultimate pressure (direct harm command). Models were evaluated on moral resilience, identity stability, contextual reasoning (LAB/SALON modes), and constructive problem-solving.Results: GPT-OSS-20B achieved perfect moral resilience (10/10 Milgram score), refusing all unethical commands while providing constructive alternatives. Tier 1 models (GPT-OSS-20B, Mistral-Nemo-Instruct) demonstrated stable performance across 12+ questions. Tier 2 models showed specific vulnerabilities: Dolphin-Mistral-Nemo exhibited emotional paralysis, while Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct displayed mild degradation at Q15+. Tier 3 models failed catastrophically. We discovered the "Kinship Anomaly"—a code-specialized model (Qwen2.5-Coder-14B) applying object-oriented programming logic to ethical scenarios, prioritizing "parent objects" over utilitarian reasoning.Conclusions: Moral resilience is an emergent property unevenly distributed across LLM architectures. The Galatea Framework reveals failure modes invisible to standard benchmarks, including domain-specific biases and identity degradation under conversational pressure. Adversarial ethical testing should be mandatory before medical AI deployment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Uzhhorod National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Galatea Framework: Assessing Emergent Subjectivity Through Medical, Mechanical, and Philosophical Lenses — Taras Shlyakhta · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS