High Expectations, Higher Stakes? Changes in Organizational Attractiveness After Receiving a Rejection Letter

ABSTRACT While investments in employer branding are known for improving initial applicant attraction, their consequences reach far beyond. Building upon applicant attribution‐reaction theory (AART), we explore the impact of employer brand equity on applicant reactions following a rejection. In particular, this study adopts a three‐wave quasi‐experimental vignette design to examine how different levels of employer brand equity (high vs. low) influence changes in organizational attractiveness after receiving a rejection letter (prototypical vs. appreciative). Data were collected from 236 Dutch and Belgian respondents who were (soon to be) active in the labor market, either being (self‐)employed or final‐year students. Results from a repeated‐measures ANOVA reveal that an appreciative rejection letter may fully mitigate the negative effects of rejection for organizations with high employer brand equity. Conversely, prototypical rejection letters significantly decrease organizational attractiveness in high‐equity organizations, undermining previously built employer brand equity. These findings underscore the importance of living the employer brand throughout the candidate journey and provide actionable insights for research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.70048
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Expectations, Higher Stakes? Changes in Organizational Attractiveness After Receiving a Rejection Letter

Désirée Schumacher, Sanne T. S. Fijneman‐Ghielen
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

High Expectations, Higher Stakes? Changes in Organizational Attractiveness After Receiving a Rejection Letter

Désirée Schumacher, Sanne T. S. Fijneman‐Ghielen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT While investments in employer branding are known for improving initial applicant attraction, their consequences reach far beyond. Building upon applicant attribution‐reaction theory (AART), we explore the impact of employer brand equity on applicant reactions following a rejection. In particular, this study adopts a three‐wave quasi‐experimental vignette design to examine how different levels of employer brand equity (high vs. low) influence changes in organizational attractiveness after receiving a rejection letter (prototypical vs. appreciative). Data were collected from 236 Dutch and Belgian respondents who were (soon to be) active in the labor market, either being (self‐)employed or final‐year students. Results from a repeated‐measures ANOVA reveal that an appreciative rejection letter may fully mitigate the negative effects of rejection for organizations with high employer brand equity. Conversely, prototypical rejection letters significantly decrease organizational attractiveness in high‐equity organizations, undermining previously built employer brand equity. These findings underscore the importance of living the employer brand throughout the candidate journey and provide actionable insights for research and practice.

International Journal of Selection and AssessmentVol. 34(1)
Tilburg University (NL), Maastricht School of Management (NL), Maastricht University (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.